Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About MGP Ingredients, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGPI)?
Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About MGP Ingredients, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGPI)?
With its stock down 48% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard MGP Ingredients (NASDAQ:MGPI). However, a closer look at its sound financials might cause you to think again. Given that fundamentals usually drive long-term market outcomes, the company is worth looking at. In this article, we decided to focus on MGP Ingredients' ROE.
由於其股價在過去三個月中下跌了48%,很容易忽視MGP Ingredients(納斯達克股票代碼:MGPI)。但是,仔細觀察其良好的財務狀況可能會讓你重新考慮。鑑於基本面通常會推動長期市場業績,該公司值得關注。在本文中,我們決定重點關注MGP Ingredients的投資回報率。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
股本回報率或投資回報率是對公司價值增長和管理投資者資金的有效性的考驗。換句話說,它是一種盈利比率,用於衡量公司股東提供的資本的回報率。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
投資回報率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續經營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for MGP Ingredients is:
因此,根據上述公式,MGP 原料的投資回報率爲:
12% = US$108m ÷ US$913m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
12% = 1.08億美元 ÷ 9.13億美元(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.12 in profit.
「回報」 是每年的利潤。另一種思考方式是,每持有價值1美元的股權,該公司就能獲得0.12美元的利潤。
What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?
投資回報率與收益增長有什麼關係?
Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.
到目前爲止,我們已經了解到,ROE衡量的是公司創造利潤的效率。然後,根據公司對這些利潤進行再投資或 「保留」 的金額及其有效性,我們就能評估公司的盈利增長潛力。假設其他條件相同,與不具有相同特徵的公司相比,既有更高股本回報率又更高利潤保留率的公司通常是增長率更高的公司。
MGP Ingredients' Earnings Growth And 12% ROE
MGP Ingredients的收益增長和12%的投資回報
To start with, MGP Ingredients' ROE looks acceptable. Yet, the fact that the company's ROE is lower than the industry average of 16% does temper our expectations. However, we are pleased to see the impressive 22% net income growth reported by MGP Ingredients over the past five years. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. Such as - high earnings retention or an efficient management in place. However, not to forget, the company does have a decent ROE to begin with, just that it is lower than the industry average. So this also does lend some color to the high earnings growth seen by the company.
首先,MGP Ingredients的投資回報率似乎是可以接受的。但是,該公司的投資回報率低於行業平均水平的16%,這一事實確實降低了我們的預期。但是,我們很高興看到MGP Ingredients在過去五年中報告了令人印象深刻的22%的淨收入增長。我們認爲這裏可能還有其他因素在起作用。例如——高收益留存率或實行高效管理。但是,不要忘記,該公司一開始確實有不錯的投資回報率,只是低於行業平均水平。因此,這也確實爲該公司的高收益增長增添了一些色彩。
Next, on comparing with the industry net income growth, we found that MGP Ingredients' growth is quite high when compared to the industry average growth of 11% in the same period, which is great to see.
接下來,與行業淨收入增長相比,我們發現MGP Ingredients的增長相當高,而同期的行業平均增長率爲11%,這真是太好了。
The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. One good indicator of expected earnings growth is the P/E ratio which determines the price the market is willing to pay for a stock based on its earnings prospects. So, you may want to check if MGP Ingredients is trading on a high P/E or a low P/E, relative to its industry.
爲公司附加價值的基礎在很大程度上與其收益增長息息相關。投資者接下來需要確定的是,預期的收益增長或缺乏收益是否已經包含在股價中。通過這樣做,他們將知道股票是走向清澈的藍色海水還是沼澤水域在等着呢。衡量預期收益增長的一個很好的指標是市盈率,它根據收益前景決定了市場願意爲股票支付的價格。因此,您可能需要檢查MGP Ingredients相對於其行業是高市盈率還是低市盈率。
Is MGP Ingredients Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?
MGP Ingredients 能否有效地將其利潤再投資?
MGP Ingredients' three-year median payout ratio to shareholders is 10.0%, which is quite low. This implies that the company is retaining 90% of its profits. So it seems like the management is reinvesting profits heavily to grow its business and this reflects in its earnings growth number.
MGP Ingredients的三年股東派息率中位數爲10.0%,相當低。這意味着該公司保留了90%的利潤。因此,管理層似乎正在將利潤大量再投資以發展業務,這反映在其收益增長數字上。
Besides, MGP Ingredients has been paying dividends for at least ten years or more. This shows that the company is committed to sharing profits with its shareholders. Our latest analyst data shows that the future payout ratio of the company over the next three years is expected to be approximately 10%.
此外,MGP Ingredients已經派發股息了至少十年或更長時間。這表明該公司致力於與股東分享利潤。我們最新的分析師數據顯示,公司未來三年的派息率預計約爲10%。
Conclusion
結論
Overall, we are quite pleased with MGP Ingredients' performance. In particular, it's great to see that the company has seen significant growth in its earnings backed by a respectable ROE and a high reinvestment rate. With that said, on studying the latest analyst forecasts, we found that while the company has seen growth in its past earnings, analysts expect its future earnings to shrink. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.
總的來說,我們對MGP Ingredients的表現非常滿意。特別是,很高興看到該公司的收益在可觀的投資回報率和高再投資率的支持下實現了顯著增長。話雖如此,在研究最新的分析師預測時,我們發現,儘管該公司過去的收益有所增長,但分析師預計其未來收益將萎縮。這些分析師的預期是基於對該行業的廣泛預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊此處進入我們分析師對公司的預測頁面。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。