share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore WesBanco, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WSBC) Recent US$73m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore WesBanco, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WSBC) Recent US$73m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能忽視韋斯銀行(納斯達克:WSBC)最近市值下降7300萬美元,因爲長期利潤仍處於正增長中。
Simply Wall St ·  12/18 23:00

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, WesBanco's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,韋斯銀行的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 業務的50%由前17位股東持有。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。

A look at the shareholders of WesBanco, Inc. (NASDAQ:WSBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看韋斯銀行公司(納斯達克:WSBC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。機構持有69%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.1% last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

在投資中虧損是所有股東都不喜歡的事情,尤其是看到其持有價值上週下降了3.1%的機構投資者。然而,17%的年度回報可能緩解了這一下跌的衝擊。我們假設他們將會對未來的弱點保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about WesBanco.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於韋斯銀行的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqGS:WSBC Ownership Breakdown December 18th 2024
納斯達克GS:WSBC 持股分佈 2024年12月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WesBanco?

機構持股對韋斯銀行意味着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that WesBanco does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of WesBanco, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到韋斯銀行確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師研究了該股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,檢查韋斯銀行過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:WSBC Earnings and Revenue Growth December 18th 2024
納斯達克GS:WSBC 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月18日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. WesBanco is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會的決策。韋斯銀行並不被對沖基金擁有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有9.0%的流通股份。爲了提供一些背景,第二大股東約持有7.9%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股比例爲6.1%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更仔細地看一下我們的股權數據,前17大股東的合計持股達到50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對控股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。

Insider Ownership Of WesBanco

韋斯銀行的內部人持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WesBanco, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$66m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士在韋斯銀行持有一些股份。內部人士擁有價值6600萬美元的顯著股份。大多數人會將其視爲一個積極的信號。看到內部人士有這樣的投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看那些內部人士最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in WesBanco. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在韋斯銀行持有28%的股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with WesBanco .

我發現查看到底誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們在韋斯銀行發現的一個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論