Private Companies Invested in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥380m Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥380m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) is 25%
- 在三導技術(蘇州)中,私營企業的相當大股份表明它們在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的發言權。
- 前四大股東持有52%的股份。
- Triductor科技(蘇州)的機構持股比例爲25%。
A look at the shareholders of Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察Triductor科技(蘇州)有限公司(SHSE:688259)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私營公司在該公司的股份佔比最大,達到37%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大收益潛力(或損失風險)。
As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥380m.
因此,私營企業作爲一個整體在上週遭受了最高的損失,市值下降了38000萬人民幣。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Triductor Technology (Suzhou).
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於Triductor Technology(蘇州)的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Triductor Technology (Suzhou)?
機構持股告訴我們關於Triductor Technology(蘇州)的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Triductor Technology (Suzhou). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Triductor Technology (Suzhou)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Triductor Technology (Suzhou). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Triductor Technology (Suzhou)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) is not owned by hedge funds. Chongqing Chuangruiying Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 28% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
三端科技(蘇州)並不被對沖基金持有。 重慶創瑞盈企業管理有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有28%的流通股。 作爲參考,第二大股東持有大約14%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.0%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即公司約52%的股份由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東在業務上具有重要影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構持股能爲您的研究增值,但研究分析師的建議也是一種良好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何分析師對該股票的覆蓋,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Triductor Technology (Suzhou)
Triductor科技(蘇州)的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It seems the board members have no more than CN¥2.7m worth of shares in the CN¥4.1b company. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士在他們自己名下持有的Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc.的股份不足1%。然而,內部人士可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有股份。看起來董事會成員在這家市值41億元的公司中持有的股份不超過270萬人民幣。許多人傾向於更喜歡看到持股更大的董事會。接下來的一個好步驟可能是查看這份內部人士買入和賣出的免費總結。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司32%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 6.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
持有6.0%的股權,股權投資公司有機會參與塑造企業策略,重點關注價值創造。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠推動有助於市場認識到公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Triductor Technology (Suzhou) stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私營公司擁有37%的三導科技(蘇州)股票。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司的股份而非以個人身份對上市公司有利益。在得出廣泛的結論時很困難,但值得注意的是,這是一個進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Triductor Technology (Suzhou) you should be aware of, and 1 of them doesn't sit too well with us.
我覺得了解一家公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。相關例子:我們發現三導科技(蘇州)有3個警告信號你需要注意,其中1個讓我們感到不太舒適。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的股票購買選擇。因此,請查看這個有趣公司的免費列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。