share_log

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312) CEO Yan Liu's Holdings Dropped 9.9% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312) CEO Yan Liu's Holdings Dropped 9.9% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

燕麥科技(SHSE:688312)CEO劉燕的持股價值因最近的回調下降了9.9%。
Simply Wall St ·  12/18 18:14

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology is 17%
  • 內部人士似乎對燕麥科技的增長有切身利益,正如他們的可觀持股所示。
  • 前兩大股東持有公司52%的股份
  • 燕麥科技的機構持股爲17%。

If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 47% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制燕麥科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688312),那麼你必須查看其股份登記的組成。 內部人士以47%的股權擁有該公司的最大股份。 換句話說,集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.9%.

上週,內部人士承受了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了9.9%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於燕麥科技的不同所有權集團。

big
SHSE:688312 Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
SHSE:688312 所有權分解 2024年12月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Yanmade Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們關於燕麥科技什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

燕麥科技已經在股東登記上擁有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,值得檢查燕麥科技過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SHSE:688312 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
SHSE:688312 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology. The company's CEO Yan Liu is the largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.0% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在燕麥科技的股份不多。公司CEO劉彥是最大股東,持有47%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.0%和2.7%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。該股票有一些分析師覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它仍然可能變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology

燕麥科技的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.6b, and insiders have CN¥2.2b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有燕麥科技一個合理的股份比例。它的市值僅爲46億人民幣,內部人士持有價值22億人民幣的股票。看到內部人士如此投資於業務真是太好了。檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否有在買入,可能會很值得。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆,包括零售投資者,在公司的股份中擁有29%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這群人不一定能做主,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生實質性的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.2%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司6.2%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人身份的方式,對一家上市公司有利益。雖然很難做出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Yanmade Technology (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現了解一家公司具體由誰擁有非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了燕麥科技的兩個警告信號(其中一個不容忽視!),在此之前你應該了解這些信息再進行投資。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論