Institutional Investors May Overlook Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORRF) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORRF) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Orrstown Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Orrstown Financial Services的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 前 25 名股東擁有公司 46% 的股份
- 內部人士最近的銷售額
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORRF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了奧爾斯敦金融服務公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ORRF),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲46%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.7% last week. Still, the 31% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降6.7%的機構投資者了。儘管如此,31%的年度漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Orrstown Financial Services.
在下圖中,我們放大了Orrstown Financial Services的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Orrstown Financial Services?
關於奧爾斯敦金融服務,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Orrstown Financial Services does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Orrstown Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,Orrstown Financial Services確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看奧爾斯敦金融服務過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
It would appear that 9.3% of Orrstown Financial Services shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Fourthstone LLC is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. With 7.7% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
看來奧爾斯敦金融服務公司9.3%的股票由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,Fourthstone LLC是最大股東,已發行股份的9.3%。貝萊德公司和先鋒集團公司分別擁有7.7%和5.1%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Orrstown Financial Services
奧爾斯敦金融服務的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$33m worth of stock in the US$745m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值7.45億美元的公司價值3300萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Orrstown Financial Services. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有40%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對奧爾斯敦金融服務有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Orrstown Financial Services better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Orrstown Financial Services (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解奧爾斯敦金融服務,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了 Orrstown Financial Services 的 4 個警告信號(1 個不容忽視!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。