Amerant Bancorp Inc.'s (NYSE:AMTB) Latest 8.9% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Amerant Bancorp Inc.'s (NYSE:AMTB) Latest 8.9% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Amerant Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 高機構所有權意味着Amerant Bancorp的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 前 13 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股份
- 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有一個深刻的了解
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Amerant Bancorp Inc. (NYSE:AMTB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了Amerant Bancorp Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AMTB),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲54%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 8.9% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 5.7% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Amerant Bancorp which might hurt individual investors.
在上週該公司股價下跌8.9%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。最近的虧損加上股東一年虧損5.7%,可能不適合這群投資者。機構通常被稱爲 「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Amerant Bancorp,這可能會傷害個人投資者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Amerant Bancorp.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Amerant Bancorp的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amerant Bancorp?
關於Amerant Bancorp,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Amerant Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amerant Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者持有Amerant Bancorp的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Amerant Bancorp過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Amerant Bancorp. Wellington Management Group LLP is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.9% of common stock, and Patriot Financial Manager, L.P. holds about 5.5% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Amerant Bancorp進行有意義的投資。惠靈頓管理集團有限責任公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的13%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有5.9%的普通股,愛國者財務經理有限責任公司持有該公司約5.5%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東擁有公司50%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Amerant Bancorp
Amerant Bancorp 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Amerant Bancorp Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$102m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Amerant Bancorp Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值1.02億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Amerant Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Amerant Bancorp擁有30%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Amerant Bancorp有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 5.5%, private equity firms could influence the Amerant Bancorp board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有5.5%的股份,可能會影響Amerant Bancorp董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amerant Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Amerant Bancorp .
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Amerant Bancorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Amerant Bancorp上發現的兩個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。