share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:PGC) Recent US$68m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:PGC) Recent US$68m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽視Peapack-Gladstone金融公司(納斯達克:PGC)近期市值下降6800萬美元,因爲長期利潤仍保持在增長狀態。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/19 22:40

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着Peapack-Gladstone Financial的股票價格對他們的交易行動敏感。
  • 前十名股東持有50%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation(納斯達克:PGC),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有絕大部分股份,持股比例爲75%。換句話說,該團體在對公司的投資中最有可能獲利(或遭受最大損失)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$68m last week. However, the 14% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

在公司市值上週下滑6800萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最高損失。然而,14%的年回報率可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。然而,我們認爲他們會在未來關注潛在的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Peapack-Gladstone Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解Peapack-Gladstone Financial的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:PGC Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
納斯達克GS:PGC 所有權分解2024年12月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peapack-Gladstone Financial?

機構持股對Peapack-Gladstone Financial告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that Peapack-Gladstone Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Peapack-Gladstone Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Peapack-Gladstone Financial確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Peapack-Gladstone Financial的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:PGC Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
納斯達克GS:PGC 2024年12月19日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 6.3% and 6.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP and James Weichert are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Douglas Kennedy, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對Peapack-Gladstone Financial來說,對沖基金的持股並不多。 貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有10%的流通股份。 分別持有6.3%和6.1%流通股份的Dimensional Fund Advisors LP和James Weichert是第二和第三大股東。 此外,我們發現首席執行官Douglas Kennedy持有0.5%的股份。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十大股東佔股份登記的一半以上,還有一些較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Peapack-Gladstone Financial

Peapack-Gladstone Financial的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation. Insiders have a US$64m stake in this US$606m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有比重合理的Peapack-GladstonE金融公司股份。內部人士在這家市值爲60600萬美元的企業中擁有6400萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示出與股東的對齊,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Peapack-GladstonE金融公司中持有14%的股份。雖然這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Peapack-Gladstone Financial you should be aware of.

我發現觀察誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現了2個需要注意的Peapack-Gladstone Financial的警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論