Is Covenant Logistics Group (NYSE:CVLG) A Risky Investment?
Is Covenant Logistics Group (NYSE:CVLG) A Risky Investment?
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (NYSE:CVLG) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,盟約物流集團有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CVLG)也使用債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或用自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Covenant Logistics Group's Net Debt?
盟約物流集團的淨負債是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 Covenant Logistics Group had debt of US$265.6m, up from US$184.6m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$35.2m, its net debt is less, at about US$230.4m.
您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2024年9月,盟約物流集團的債務爲2.656億美元,高於一年的1.846億美元。但是,由於其現金儲備爲3520萬美元,其淨負債較少,約爲2.304億美元。
How Strong Is Covenant Logistics Group's Balance Sheet?
盟約物流集團的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Covenant Logistics Group had liabilities of US$194.6m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$383.4m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$35.2m and US$142.6m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$400.3m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到盟約物流集團在12個月內到期的負債爲1.946億美元,在此之後到期的負債爲3.834億美元。另一方面,它有一年內到期的現金爲3520萬美元,還有價值1.426億美元的應收賬款。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出4.03億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Covenant Logistics Group has a market capitalization of US$747.3m, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
儘管這可能看起來很多,但還不錯,因爲Covenant Logistics Group的市值爲7.473億美元,因此如果需要,它可能會通過籌集資金來加強資產負債表。但是,我們絕對希望留意其債務帶來過大風險的跡象。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們債務水平與收益的關係。第一個是淨負債除以扣除利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)抵消利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
Covenant Logistics Group has net debt worth 1.6 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 4.9 times the interest expense. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. It is well worth noting that Covenant Logistics Group's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 42% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Covenant Logistics Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Covenant Logistics Group的淨負債價值是息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的1.6倍,這並不算過高,但其利息保障範圍看起來有點偏低,息稅前利潤僅爲利息支出的4.9倍。這在很大程度上是由於該公司收取了巨額折舊和攤銷費用,這可以說意味着其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤是衡量收益的非常慷慨的指標,其債務可能比最初看起來更具負擔。值得注意的是,盟約物流集團的息稅前利潤像雨後竹子一樣飆升,在過去十二個月中增長了42%。這將使其更容易管理債務。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定盟約物流集團能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Covenant Logistics Group burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.
但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,盟約物流集團燒燬了大量現金。儘管投資者無疑預計這種情況將在適當的時候逆轉,但這顯然意味着其使用債務的風險更大。
Our View
我們的觀點
Covenant Logistics Group's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Covenant Logistics Group is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example Covenant Logistics Group has 3 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
在我們看來,Covenant Logistics Group將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流和總負債水平無疑對其造成了壓力。但其息稅前利潤增長率卻是一個截然不同的故事,也表明了一定的彈性。從上面提到的所有角度來看,在我們看來,由於其債務,Covent Logistics Group確實是一項風險較大的投資。並非所有風險都是壞的,因爲如果得到回報,它可以提高股價回報,但是這種債務風險值得牢記。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,Covenant Logistics Group有3個警告標誌(還有一個讓我們有點不舒服),我們認爲你應該知道。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。