share_log

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) After 24% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) After 24% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

投資於萊斯康製藥公司的股權投資公司經歷了痛苦的一週(納斯達克:LXRX),在24%的下跌之後,機構也遭受了損失。
Simply Wall St ·  12/20 02:15

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is 33%
  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals擁有大量私募股權公司的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司62%的股份
  • Lexicon Pharmicals的機構所有權爲33%

Every investor in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 48% stake, private equity firms possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Lexicon Pharmicals, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LXRX)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。私募股權公司擁有48%的股份,是該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While institutions, who own 33% shares weren't spared from last week's US$77m market cap drop, private equity firms as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有33%股票的機構未能倖免於上週7700萬美元市值的下降,但私募股權公司作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Lexicon Pharmicals的每種所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:LXRX Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
NASDAQGS: LXRX 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lexicon Pharmaceuticals?

關於Lexicon Pharmicals,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Lexicon Pharmicals已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Lexicon Pharmaceuticals的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:LXRX Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
NASDAQGS: LXRX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 12 月 19 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Our data shows that Artal Group S.A. is the largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在Lexicon Pharmicals的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,Artal Group S.A. 是最大股東,已發行股份的48%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的14%和3.0%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

Lexicon 製藥的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$3.1m worth of the US$265m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有Lexicon Pharmicals, Inc.的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值2.65億美元的公司價值310萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 48%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司擁有48%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lexicon Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Lexicon Pharmaceuticals,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,Lexicon Pharmicals在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中一個與之有關...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論