share_log

COFCO Technology & Industry Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301058) Last Week's 7.1% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

COFCO Technology & Industry Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301058) Last Week's 7.1% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

中糧科技與行業股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所:301058)上週7.1%的下跌一定讓持有重要股份的私營公司感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  12/20 06:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over COFCO Technology & Industry by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 私營公司對中糧科技工業的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有3名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

A look at the shareholders of COFCO Technology & Industry Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301058) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看中糧科技工業股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:301058)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥446m.

結果,在市值下降44600萬元人民幣之後,私營公司作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of COFCO Technology & Industry.

在下圖中,我們放大了中糧科技工業的不同所有權群體。

big
SZSE:301058 Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
SZSE: 301058 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About COFCO Technology & Industry?

關於中糧科技工業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in COFCO Technology & Industry. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at COFCO Technology & Industry's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者持有中糧科技與工業的相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看中糧科技與工業的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SZSE:301058 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
SZSE: 301058 2024年12月19日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in COFCO Technology & Industry. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is COFCO Corporation with 39% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.6% and 4.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在中糧科技與工業的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是中糧集團公司,已發行股份的39%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.6%和4.0%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,3名最大股東通過其50%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of COFCO Technology & Industry

中糧科技工業的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員個人持有股份。鑑於我們沒有獲得內部所有權,我們可能缺少數據。因此,在這裏評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期會很有趣。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in COFCO Technology & Industry. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有中糧科技工業29%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 59%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的59%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 3.4% of the COFCO Technology & Industry shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有中糧科技工業3.4%的已發行股份。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一個戰略利益。這些企業可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - COFCO Technology & Industry has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例-中糧科技工業有兩個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論