Unionman Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688609) Surges 7.1%; Retail Investors Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Unionman Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688609) Surges 7.1%; Retail Investors Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Unionman TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders own 32% of Unionman TechnologyLtd
- 零售投資者在聯盟科技有限公司的相當所有權表明,他們在管理和業務策略上集體擁有更大的發言權。
- 前25大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人士擁有聯盟科技有限公司32%的股份。
Every investor in Unionman Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688609) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投資者在聯盟科技有限公司(SHSE:688609)都應了解最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到,零售投資者在公司中擁有50%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(或者在市場下跌時將損失最多)。
While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's CN¥399m market cap gain, insiders too had a 32% share in those profits.
雖然散戶投資者是上週市值增加CN¥39900萬的最大受益者,但內部人也佔有32%的利潤份額。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Unionman TechnologyLtd.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Unionman科技有限公司的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Unionman TechnologyLtd?
機構持股告訴我們關於Unionman科技有限公司的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
Unionman TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Unionman TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Unionman科技有限公司已經在股東名冊上有機構存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Unionman科技有限公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總是還有更多的故事。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Unionman TechnologyLtd. With a 13% stake, CEO Qijun Zhan is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 5.4% of the stock.
我們注意到對Unionman Technology Ltd的對沖基金投資並不顯著。CEO佔股13%,是最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約8.4%和5.4%的股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
通過研究我們的持股數據,我們發現前25大股東共同持有的股份少於50%,這意味着沒有任何個人擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構持股是一種評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究同樣可以達到此目的。對該股票的分析師覆蓋率略低,但不多。因此它有增加更多覆蓋機會。
Insider Ownership Of Unionman TechnologyLtd
Unionman Technology Ltd的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Unionman Technology Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥6.0b, and insiders have CN¥2.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
內部人士似乎擁有Unionman科技有限公司的相當大一部分股份。目前市值僅爲60億人民幣,內部人士名下的股份價值爲20億人民幣。看到內部人士如此投入於業務是非常好的。也許值得查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Unionman TechnologyLtd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆擁有50%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,因而在Unionman科技有限公司上有一定的影響力。儘管這一股份比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這一比例可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.8%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有3.8%的已發行股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私營公司的所有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過一個單獨的私營公司對上市公司的股份也會有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Unionman TechnologyLtd , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,投資風險始終存在。我們已經識別出Unionman Technology Ltd的兩個警告信號,理解這些信號應該是你投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。