ASMPT Limited's (HKG:522) HK$1.3b Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 3.4% Returns
ASMPT Limited's (HKG:522) HK$1.3b Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 3.4% Returns
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ASMPT's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 由於機構在股票上的大額持股,ASMPT的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前四大股東持有52%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
Every investor in ASMPT Limited (HKG:522) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位ASMPT有限公司(HKG:522)的投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有59%股份的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(如果市場下跌,則損失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.9% last week. Still, the 3.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
投資虧損是所有股東都不願意面對的,尤其是那些上週其持有的股份價值下跌了3.9%的機構投資者。儘管如此,3.4%的年度收益可能幫助他們減輕了整體損失。不過,我們認爲他們將會留意未來的弱點。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ASMPT, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討ASMPT的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ASMPT?
機構持股告訴我們關於ASMPT的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
ASMPT already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ASMPT, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
ASMPT已經在股份登記中有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作分析師已經研究過該股票,並且他們對此持積極態度。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能判斷錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,查看ASMPT過去的盈利軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,也要考慮其他因素。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ASMPT. ASM International NV is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Fidelity International Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 17% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.3% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們一起可能會強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到對ASMPT的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。ASM International NV目前是最大的股東,擁有25%的流通股份。Fidelity International Ltd是第二大股東,擁有17%的普通股,而Capital Research and Management Company持有約5.3%的公司股票。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察,我們發現前四大股東擁有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中有重要發言權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of ASMPT
ASMPT的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of ASMPT Limited in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$36m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士在ASMPT有限公司名下持有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值3600萬港元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少一些內部人士持股總是好的,但可能值得查看這些內部人士是否曾賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有16%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的持股規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 25% of ASMPT. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們認爲,公衆公司擁有ASMPT 25%的股份。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性股份。這些業務可能類似,或者一起合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - ASMPT has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的重要性是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,承擔風險 - ASMPT 有 1 個警示信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。