While Institutions Invested in Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600577) Benefited From Last Week's 24% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most
While Institutions Invested in Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600577) Benefited From Last Week's 24% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 12% of Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire is held by insiders
- 精達股份的重大個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響。
- 前25名股東持有47%的業務。
- 12%的精達股份由內部人士持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600577), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了精達股份有限公司(SHSE:600577),了解公司的股權結構是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約53%,確切來說,是個人投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(或者如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥17b last week, while institutions who own 16% also benefitted.
個人投資者在上週市值達到170億人民幣後獲得了最大的收益,而持有16%的機構也受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire.
讓我們更詳細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於精達股份的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire?
機構持股告訴我們關於精達股份什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到精達股份確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像任何人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易失誤時,多個方可能會迅速競爭出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到精達股份的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,情況總是更復雜。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire. Tehua Investment Holding Co., Ltd., Investment Arm is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Sinosafe General Insurance Co., Ltd, Asset Management Arm is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and Xiaohui Qiao holds about 8.1% of the company stock.
我們注意到對精達股份的對沖基金並沒有進行重大投資。 Tehua投資控股有限公司的投資部門目前是公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。 Sinosafe綜合保險有限公司的資產管理部門是第二大股東,擁有9.3%的普通股,而Xiaohui Qiao持有約8.1%的公司股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的觀點以了解市場風向同樣是有意義的。雖然有分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire
管理層對精達股份的持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥2.0b stake in this CN¥17b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在精達股份持有大量股份。看到內部人士在這個市值170億的企業中擁有價值20億人民幣的股份,令人非常感興趣。看到這樣的投資水平令人欣慰。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 53% of Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,共同持有53%的精達股份。擁有這樣的股份比例,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中發揮一定作用,例如股息政策和董事的任命。他們還可以在可能不會改善盈利能力的收購或合併上行使投票權。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 12%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
持有12%的股份,股權投資公司有能力在創造價值的重點上發揮作用,塑造企業策略。有時我們看到股權投資公司會長期存在,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,並且如名稱所示,較少投資於公共公司。在一段時間後,他們可能會考慮賣出並將資本重新投入到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 6.2%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司持有6.2%的已發行股票。值得深入研究一下。如果相關方,比如內部人士,對這些私營公司有利益關係,應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司可能也對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Tongling Jingda Special Magnet Wire has 2 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——精達股份有2個警告信號(還有1個讓我們有點不安的信號),我們認爲你應該知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。