Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。重要的是,默沙東公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MRK)確實有債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。但是,通過取代稀釋,對於需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說,債務可以成爲一個非常好的工具。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。
What Is Merck's Net Debt?
默克的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Merck had US$38.1b of debt, an increase on US$34.9b, over one year. However, it does have US$14.6b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$23.5b.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年9月,默沙東在一年內有381億美元的債務,比349億美元有所增加。但是,它確實有146億美元的現金抵消了這一點,淨負債約爲235億美元。
A Look At Merck's Liabilities
看看默克的負債
The latest balance sheet data shows that Merck had liabilities of US$29.6b due within a year, and liabilities of US$43.4b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$14.6b as well as receivables valued at US$12.5b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$45.8b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,默沙東的負債爲296億美元,此後到期的負債爲434億美元。除這些債務外,它有146億美元的現金以及價值125億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出458億美元。
Given Merck has a humongous market capitalization of US$251.7b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
鑑於默沙東的龐大市值爲2517億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成很大的威脅。話雖如此,很明顯,我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以免情況惡化。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以其扣除利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)和其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以其利息支出(利息保障)。因此,無論是否有折舊和攤銷費用,我們都將債務與收益的關係考慮在內。
Merck has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.0. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 20.7 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, Merck saw its EBIT drop by 9.8% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Merck can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
默沙東的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲1.0。而且其息稅前利潤很容易彌補其利息支出,是其規模的20.7倍。因此,我們對它超保守的債務使用相當放鬆。另一方面,默沙東的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了9.8%。這種下降如果持續下去,顯然會使債務更難處理。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定默沙東能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Merck produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 73% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查有多少息稅前利潤轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,默沙東產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其息稅前利潤的73%,與我們的預期差不多。這種自由現金流使公司處於有利地位,可以在適當的時候償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Merck's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. All these things considered, it appears that Merck can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Merck is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
令人高興的是,默克令人印象深刻的利息保障意味着它在債務上佔了上風。但是,更悲觀的是,我們對它的息稅前利潤增長率有點擔憂。考慮到所有這些因素,默沙東似乎可以輕鬆應對其當前的債務水平。從好的方面來看,這種槓桿作用可以提高股東的回報,但潛在的缺點是損失風險更大,因此值得關注資產負債表。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。請注意,默沙東在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,你應該知道...
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果你有興趣投資能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增加利潤的企業,那麼請查看這份資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。