Private Companies Among Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688063) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.6% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688063) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.6% Price Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Pylon Technologies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Institutions own 19% of Pylon Technologies
- 派能科技顯著的私營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 前十大股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 機構持有19%的派能科技
If you want to know who really controls Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688063), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 40% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了派能科技有限公司(SHSE:688063),那麼你必須查看其股份登記的構成。我們可以看到,私營公司在該公司中擁有絕大部分股份,達到了40%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥10b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
上週市值下降至100億人民幣,私營企業可能會面臨比公司其他股東群體更高的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pylon Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討派能科技的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pylon Technologies?
機構所有權對派能科技的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pylon Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pylon Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在派能科技中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經考察了這隻股票,並且他們看好它。但像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到派能科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多的內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pylon Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Zhongxingxin Telecom Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 25%. With 12% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Paili (Ningbo) Venture Capital Partnership (Limited Partnership) and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Limited, Asset Management Arm are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到對派能科技對沖基金沒有實質性投資。該公司的最大股東是中興信通信有限公司,持股比例爲25%。排裏(寧波)創投合夥企業(有限合夥)和香港交易及結算有限公司的資產管理部門分別持有12%和4.4%的流通股,成爲第二和第三大股東。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步檢查發現,公司超過一半的股份由前10大股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東所平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Pylon Technologies
派能科技的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥9.6m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,派能科技有限公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們尚未注意到的公司結構間接持有股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值960萬人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例股份更重要。看到一些內部人士持股總是好的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pylon Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有40%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,因此對派能科技有一定程度的影響。雖然這個群體不一定能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 40%, of the Pylon Technologies stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
看起來派能科技的股票有40%由私人公司持有。深入研究一下這個問題可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人士,涉及這些私人公司的利益,應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Pylon Technologies has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例——派能科技有2個警告信號(還有1個稍微令人擔憂的)我們認爲你應該知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。