Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Trustmark implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在Trustmark中的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 內部人士最近一直在拋售
A look at the shareholders of Trustmark Corporation (NASDAQ:TRMK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 78% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看Trustmark Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:TRMK)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲78%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.9% last week. However, the 33% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降4.9%的機構投資者了。但是,33%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Trustmark, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Trustmark的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trustmark?
關於信任標誌,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Trustmark does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trustmark's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,Trustmark確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Trustmark的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Trustmark is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Trustmark 不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的15%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分別擁有11%和6.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前7名股東擁有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上由較小股東所平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Trustmark
Trustmark 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Trustmark Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$35m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Trustmark公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值3500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Trustmark better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Trustmark that you should be aware of before investing here.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Trustmark,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了Trustmark的3個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。