Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688627) Market Cap Touched CN¥7.9b Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 35% as Well as Institutions
Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688627) Market Cap Touched CN¥7.9b Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 35% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insider ownership in Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies is 19%
- 個人投資者對深圳SEICHI科技公司的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更大的影響力。
- 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 深圳SEICHI科技公司的內部持股比例爲19%。
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688627) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看深圳SEICHI科技有限公司(SHSE:688627)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,個人投資者在公司的持股比例高達35%。換句話說,該群體從投資公司中獲得的收益最大(或損失最大)。
Following a 15% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 27% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
在上週股價上漲15%後,散戶投資者獲得了最大的收益,而持有27%股票的機構也從中獲利。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解深圳SEICHI科技每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies?
機構所有權告訴我們關於深圳SEICHI科技什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
深圳SEICHI科技已經在股東名冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證是有風險的。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看深圳SEICHI科技過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies. Our data shows that Bin Zhang is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.4% of the stock.
對沖基金在深圳SEICHI科技公司持有的股份不多。我們的數據表明,張斌是最大的股東,持有19%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大的股東分別持有約5.6%和5.4%的股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前十大股東佔股份登記的一半以上,還有一些較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也可以實現這一點。雖然有一些分析師的研究覆蓋,但公司的覆蓋範圍可能不廣。因此,未來可能會獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies
深圳SEICHI科技公司的內部人持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥7.9b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在深圳瑟奇科技有限公司持有重要股份。該公司的市值僅爲79億人民幣,內部人士以自己名義持有價值15億人民幣的股份。這相當顯著。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆的持股比例爲35%,主要由個人投資者組成,對深圳瑟奇科技有一定程度的影響。雖然這種持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 11%, private equity firms could influence the Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
持有11%股份的股權投資公司可能會對深圳SEICHI科技的董事會產生影響。 一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠推動戰略,從而使市場看到公司的價值。 或者,這些持有者可能在上市後選擇退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 5.0%, of the Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起來私人公司持有深圳SEICHI科技5.0%的股票。 私人公司可能是相關方。 有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司股票而與上市公司有利益關係,而不是以個人身份。 雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得關注這一領域進行進一步研究。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 3.6% of Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我們認爲,上市公司持有深圳SEICHI科技3.6%的股份。 很難確定,但這表明它們有交織的商業利益。 這可能是一個戰略性股份,因此值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Shenzhen SEICHI Technologies is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning...
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是很值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,深圳SEICHI科技在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,其中1個讓人有些擔憂...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。