Tianfeng Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601162) Stock Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 59%, While Private Companies Hold 27%
Tianfeng Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601162) Stock Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 59%, While Private Companies Hold 27%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Tianfeng Securities by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 40% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Institutions own 12% of Tianfeng Securities
- 零售投資者對天風證券的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策中有更大的影響力
- 前25位股東持有該業務40%的股份。
- 機構持有天風證券12%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Tianfeng Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601162), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道到底是誰在控制天風證券股份有限公司(SHSE:601162),那你得查看其股權登記的構成。我們可以看到,零售投資者在公司中佔據了巨大的份額,持有59%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Meanwhile, private companies make up 27% of the company's shareholders.
與此同時,私人公司佔公司股東的27%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Tianfeng Securities.
讓我們更詳細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於天風證券的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tianfeng Securities?
機構持股情況對我們了解天風證券有什麼幫助?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Tianfeng Securities. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tianfeng Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在天風證券中持有相當大的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽。然而,最好小心依賴來機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到天風證券的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,背後總有更多的故事。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Tianfeng Securities. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Hubei Hongtai Group Co., Ltd with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.9% and 2.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對天風證券的對沖基金沒有實質性投資。根據我們的數據,最大股東是湖北洪泰集團有限公司,佔有15%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.9%和2.3%的流通股。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,可以更深入地理解股票的預期表現。就我們所知,似乎沒有分析師對該公司的覆蓋,因此它可能在雷達下飛行。
Insider Ownership Of Tianfeng Securities
天風證券股權的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們注意到我們的數據沒有顯示任何董事會成員個人持有股份。鑑於我們沒有捕捉到內部持股信息,我們可能缺少數據。因此,評估CEO的薪酬和任期將是一個有趣的課題。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 59% stake in Tianfeng Securities, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在天風證券中持有59%的股份,這表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平使來自更大公衆的投資者有能力影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 27%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有27%的發行股份。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私人公司的真正所有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tianfeng Securities better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Tianfeng Securities you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
考慮公司股東的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解天風證券,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。作爲例子:我們發現了天風證券的2個警告信號,你應該注意到,其中一個有點令人不快。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更傾向於查看另一家公司——一家有潛在優越財務狀況的公司——那麼請不要錯過這份由強大財務數據支持的有趣公司免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。