Graham Corporation's (NYSE:GHM) Institutional Investors Lost 10% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Graham Corporation's (NYSE:GHM) Institutional Investors Lost 10% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Graham implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在Graham的重大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有重要影響。
- 前12大股東持有公司的50%股份。
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
Every investor in Graham Corporation (NYSE:GHM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位Graham Corporation(紐交所代碼:GHM)的投資者都應該知道最強大的股東集團。機構持有78%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最多的利益(或者在市場下跌時損失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$52m last week. Still, the 114% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降5200萬美元后遭受了最高的損失。不過,114%的年度收益可能幫助減輕了他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Graham.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Graham的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graham?
機構持股情況對格雷厄姆有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Graham does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Graham, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Graham確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好仍然保持警惕,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。它們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售某隻股票,出現大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,查看Graham過去的收益軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,考慮其他因素也是必要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Graham. Brandes Investment Partners, LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Daniel Thoren is the owner of 3.0% of the company's shares.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們能夠強有力地影響董事會決策。對沖基金在Graham中沒有很多股份。Brandes Investment Partners, LP目前是最大的股東,擁有10%的流通股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約7.0%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股比例爲5.9%。此外,CEO丹尼爾·託倫持有該公司3.0%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前12名股東合計持有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司施加重大控制。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Graham
格雷厄姆的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Graham Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$444m, and insiders have US$25m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實擁有Graham Corporation的股票。它的市值僅爲44400萬美元,內部人士名下的股票價值2500萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出的行爲。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Graham. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Graham公司17%的股份。雖然這部分股份相當可觀,但如果與其他大型股東的決定不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
許多人發現深入分析公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這一詳細的歷史營業收入、營業收入和現金流的圖表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。