Institutional Investors May Overlook AMETEK, Inc.'s (NYSE:AME) Recent US$1.4b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook AMETEK, Inc.'s (NYSE:AME) Recent US$1.4b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, AMETEK's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 17 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,AMETEK的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 前 17 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股份
- 內部人士最近已出售
A look at the shareholders of AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE:AME) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看AmeTek, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AME)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲87%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.2% in value last week. However, the 12% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降3.2%的機構投資者。但是,12%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AMETEK.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於AmeTek的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AMETEK?
機構所有權告訴我們關於 AMETEK 的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AMETEK. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AMETEK, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者持有AmeTek的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下AmeTek過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. AMETEK is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。阿美泰克不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大的股東,已發行股份的11%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.4%和4.2%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記處,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前17名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of AMETEK
AMETEK 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of AMETEK, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$168m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的AmeTek, Inc.不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有1.68億美元的股票。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AMETEK. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有12%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對AmeTek有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AMETEK better, we need to consider many other factors.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解AmeTek,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張包含過去收入、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。