Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603170) Recent 8.6% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603170) Recent 8.6% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Shanghai Bolex Food Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology is 18%
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着上海博樂克食品科技的股價對他們的交易行爲敏感
- 57%的業務由前3大股東持有
- 上海博樂克食品科技的內部持股爲18%
A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603170) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 34% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看上海博樂克食品科技有限公司(SHSE:603170)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有最大份額的集團是機構,擁有34%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最高的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥584m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 2.6% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Shanghai Bolex Food Technology, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,上週機構投資者遭受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了人民幣58400萬。這一損失,加上股東一年內的2.6%的損失,可能讓這一群體的投資者感到不滿。 這些機構被稱爲「聰明的錢」,它們在股票價格變動中具有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能會面臨賣出上海博樂食品科技的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Bolex Food Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於上海博樂食品科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Bolex Food Technology?
機構持股對我們了解上海博樂食品科技有什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Shanghai Bolex Food Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Bolex Food Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到上海博樂食品科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,看看以下上海博樂食品科技的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology. Our data shows that Genial Flow Asset Management Co.,Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 31% of shares outstanding. Ju Ma is the second largest shareholder owning 18% of common stock, and Hangzhou Baoyu Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 9.0% of the company stock.
對沖基金在上海博萊克食品科技中的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Genial Flow 資產管理有限公司是最大的股東,持有31%的流通股份。賈馬是第二大股東,擁有18%的普通股票,而杭州寶宇投資管理合夥企業(有限合夥)持有約9.0%的公司股票。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究顯示,三位頂級股東通過57%的持股量在公司中擁有相當大的所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology
上海博萊克食品科技的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.1b worth of shares in the CN¥6.2b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
insiders似乎擁有上海博樂士食品科技有限公司相當大的股份。內部人士持有價值11億人民幣的股份,公司的市值爲62億人民幣。看到內部人士如此投入於業務真是太好了。可能值得查看一下這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有上海博樂士食品科技32%的股份。儘管這個股份的大小相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Shanghai Bolex Food Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司持有上海博樂食品科技的16%股票。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的持有人。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過另一傢俬人公司對一家上市公司持有股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Shanghai Bolex Food Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了一個關於上海博樂食品科技的警告信號,在您在這裏投資之前應當注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。