share_log

The Recent 102% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Zhenwu Huang's Week, Richtech Robotics Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RR) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 102% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Zhenwu Huang's Week, Richtech Robotics Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RR) Most Bullish Insider

最近102%的漲幅一定讓富融科技(Richtech Robotics Inc.)(納斯達克:RR)的CEO黃振武的本週感到光明,最看好的內部人士。
Simply Wall St ·  12/24 18:45

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Richtech Robotics' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Richtech 機器人的顯著內部持股表明了對公司擴張的固有利益
  • 51%的業務由前8名股東持有
  • 通過公司的過去業績數據和股權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。

If you want to know who really controls Richtech Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ:RR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 52% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了 Richtech Robotics Inc.(納斯達克:RR),那麼你需要查看其股東登記的組成情況。內部人士擁有 52% 的股份,是公司最大股東。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$124m market cap following a 102% gain in the stock.

因此,上週內部人員的表現最佳,因爲公司在股票上漲102%後市值達到了12400萬美元。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Richtech Robotics.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Richtech機器人什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:RR Ownership Breakdown December 24th 2024
納斯達克CM:RR股東結構 2024年12月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Richtech Robotics?

機構投資的持股情況告訴我們關於Richtech機器人的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Less than 5% of Richtech Robotics is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

不到5%的Richtech機器人股票由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金將公司視爲目標,但許多基金尚未購買其股票。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而改善,我們可能會在未來看到更多的機構買家。同時,如果多個機構投資者在同一時間試圖買入股票,股票價格大幅上漲並不罕見。因此,請查看下面的歷史營業收入軌跡,但請記住,未來才是最重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:RR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 24th 2024
納斯達克CM:RR 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月24日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Richtech Robotics. With a 31% stake, CEO Zhenwu Huang is the largest shareholder. With 8.1% and 4.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Zhenqiang Huang and Zhao Zilong are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Zhenqiang Huang is also Top Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對Richtech 機器人來說,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股份。首席執行官黃振武擁有31%的股份,是最大的股東。黃振強和趙子龍分別持有8.1%和4.0%的流通股份,成爲第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第二大股東黃振強也是公司的首席關鍵執行官,這再次表明公司頂級股東之間的內部持股非常強勁。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多的挖掘,發現前8大股東大約佔登記的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。了解分析師情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。根據我們所了解,目前沒有關於該公司的分析師覆蓋,因此它可能正在被忽視。

Insider Ownership Of Richtech Robotics

Richtech 機器人的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Richtech Robotics Inc.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of US$124m, that means they have US$65m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Richtech機器人公司大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。根據其市值爲12400萬美元,這意味着他們持有價值6500萬美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司43%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Richtech Robotics that you should be aware of.

我發現查看公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉例來說,我們已經確定了Richtech 機器人需要注意的2個預警信號。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論