share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$96m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$96m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施,因爲Brighthouse Financial, Inc.(納斯達克:BHF)近期的9600萬美元跌幅使其長期損失加重。
Simply Wall St ·  05:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Brighthouse Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着Brighthouse Financial的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前8名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有一個深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:BHF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Brighthouse Financial, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:BHF),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲81%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 3.2% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 10% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Brighthouse Financial which might hurt individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了3.2%。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損10%,可能不適合這群投資者。也被稱爲 「智能貨幣」,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Brighthouse Financial,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Brighthouse Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Brighthouse Financial的每種類型的所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Ownership Breakdown December 24th 2024
NASDAQGS: BHF 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brighthouse Financial?

關於Brighthouse Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Brighthouse Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brighthouse Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Brighthouse Financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Brightouse Financial的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Earnings and Revenue Growth December 24th 2024
納斯達克GS:BHF收益和收入增長 2024年12月24日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Brighthouse Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Dodge & Cox with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.7% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Brighthouse Financial不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是道奇和考克斯,已發行股票的11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約10%和9.7%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股份登記冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東在一定程度上平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Brighthouse Financial

Brighthouse Financial

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$28m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的Brighthouse Financial, Inc.不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2800萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問過去的收入、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論