Institutional Owners May Ignore Enterprise Financial Services Corp's (NASDAQ:EFSC) Recent US$118m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Enterprise Financial Services Corp's (NASDAQ:EFSC) Recent US$118m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Enterprise Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 由於機構在股票中的大比例,Enterprise Financial Services的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響。
- 前11大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in Enterprise Financial Services Corp (NASDAQ:EFSC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Enterprise Financial Services CORP(納斯達克:EFSC)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構持有78%的股份,是公司股份最多的股東。換句話說,該組面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.1b last week. However, the 29% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者是受到影響最大的群體,因爲公司的市值上週跌至21億美元。然而,給予股東的29%的年度回報可能緩解了影響。不過,他們應該對未來可能的進一步損失保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Enterprise Financial Services, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Enterprise Financial Services的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Enterprise Financial Services?
機構持股情況如何反映企業金融服務的情況?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Enterprise Financial Services. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Enterprise Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Enterprise Financial Services中擁有相當的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂背書保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,檢查Enterprise Financial Services過去的收益軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,也要考慮其他因素。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Enterprise Financial Services is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 11%. With 9.5% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wellington Management Group LLP and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半,所以他們可以共同施加顯著的影響力。Enterprise Financial Services並不被對沖基金擁有。公司的最大股東是貝萊德(BlackRock, Inc.),持有11%的股份。Wellington Management Group LLP和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分別持有9.5%和5.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看我們的所有權數字,前11大股東的綜合持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Enterprise Financial Services
企業金融服務的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Enterprise Financial Services Corp. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$38m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會對管理層在Enterprise Financial Services CORP.中持有股份的消息感興趣。這些管理層持有價值3800萬美元的可觀股份。大多數人會將此視爲一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討管理層一致性的問題,可以點擊這裏查看管理層是否有買入或賣出的行爲。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中持有20%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。儘管這種持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Enterprise Financial Services better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Enterprise Financial Services that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地理解Enterprise Financial Services,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如,我們發現了Enterprise Financial Services的一個警告信號,在您在此投資之前,您應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。