Interparfums (NASDAQ:IPAR) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Interparfums (NASDAQ:IPAR) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Interparfums, Inc. (NASDAQ:IPAR) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
禾倫·巴菲特曾名言,'波動性遠非風險的同義詞。'在考慮一家公司有多風險時,自然需要查看其資產負債表,因爲企業倒閉時往往涉及債務。重要的是,Interparfums, Inc.(納斯達克:IPAR)確實有債務。那麼,這些債務對股東來說是一個問題嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務帶來風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務幫助業務,直到企業在沒有新資本或自由現金流的情況下難以償還。如果事情變得非常糟糕,貸方可以控制企業。然而,更常見(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以超低價格發行股份,永久稀釋股東權益,僅僅是爲了改善其資產負債表。然而,通過替代稀釋,債務對於需要資本進行高回報增長投資的企業來說,可以是一個極好的工具。當我們審視債務水平時,我們首先綜合考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Interparfums's Net Debt?
Interparfums的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Interparfums had US$188.1m of debt, up from US$175.3m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$157.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$30.9m.
如您所見,到2024年9月底,Interparfums的債務爲188100000美元,比一年前的175300000美元有所增加。點擊圖片了解更多細節。然而,它有157200000美元的現金抵消了這部分債務,因此淨債務約爲30900000美元。
How Strong Is Interparfums' Balance Sheet?
Interparfums的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Interparfums had liabilities of US$339.6m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$155.9m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$157.2m and US$359.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So it can boast US$21.4m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
根據最近報告的資產負債表,Interparfums的負債爲33960萬美元,需在12個月內償還,超出12個月的負債爲15590萬美元。另一方面,它擁有15720萬美元的現金和35970萬美元的應收款項將在一年內到期。因此,它的流動資產比總負債多出2140萬美元。
This state of affairs indicates that Interparfums' balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$4.09b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Carrying virtually no net debt, Interparfums has a very light debt load indeed.
這一情況表明,Interparfums的資產負債表看起來相當穩健,因爲其總負債與流動資產大致相等。因此,這家410億美元的公司不太可能缺乏現金,但仍值得關注其資產負債表。Interparfums幾乎沒有淨債務,確實負擔很輕。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了衡量一家公司相對於其收益的債務水平,我們計算其淨負債與利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及其利息和稅項前利潤(EBIT)與其利息支出(利息支付比率)的比率。因此,我們考慮了包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務的情況。
Interparfums has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.11. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 43.3 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On the other hand, Interparfums saw its EBIT drop by 2.2% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Interparfums's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Interparfums的淨債務與EBITDA的比率僅爲0.11,且其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋利息支出,規模是其43.3倍。因此,可以說它的債務帶來的威脅並不大,就像大象對老鼠的威脅一樣。另一方面,Interparfums在過去的十二個月裏,EBIT下降了2.2%。如果收益繼續以這個速度下降,公司可能會面臨越來越大的債務管理困難。毫無疑問,我們通過資產負債表了解債務,但未來的收益,尤其是未來收益的能力,更能判斷Interparfums保持健康資產負債表的能力。如果你想了解專業人士的看法,可能會對這份關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告感興趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Interparfums reported free cash flow worth 13% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.
但我們的最終考慮也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面收益償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,值得檢查一下EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,Interparfums報告的自由現金流僅佔其EBIT的13%,這真的很低。這種低水平的現金轉換削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Interparfums's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. All these things considered, it appears that Interparfums can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Interparfums , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
幸運的是,Interparfums令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率表明它在債務上佔據優勢。但從一個更嚴肅的角度來看,我們對它將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力有點擔憂。綜合考慮這些因素,Interparfums似乎能夠輕鬆應對當前的債務水平。積極的一面是,這種槓桿可以提升股東回報,但潛在的 downside 是更大的虧損風險,因此值得關注資產負債表。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可能存在表外風險。我們發現了Interparfums的一個警告信號,理解這些信號應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果你是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,今天就來發現我們獨家的淨現金成長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。