Wenhua Li WCON Electronics (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301328) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 12%last Week
Wenhua Li WCON Electronics (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301328) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 12%last Week
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- WCON Electronics (Guangdong)'s significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 52% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Institutions own 11% of WCON Electronics (Guangdong)
- WCON電子(廣東)的高管持股比例較高,表明他們對公司擴張有固有的利益。
- 前兩個股東持有52%的業務
- 機構持有WCON電子(廣東)11%的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of WCON Electronics (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301328), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制WCON電子(廣東)有限公司(SZSE:301328),了解該業務的所有權結構是很重要的。而持有最大股份的群體是個人內部人士,擁有58%的股份。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 12% gain.
因此,內部人士是上週12%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WCON Electronics (Guangdong), beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討WCON電子(廣東)的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WCON Electronics (Guangdong)?
機構擁有情況對WCON電子(廣東)意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
WCON Electronics (Guangdong) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of WCON Electronics (Guangdong), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
WCON電子(廣東)已經在股東名冊上有了機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某隻股票,則股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,值得檢查WCON電子(廣東)過去的營業收入軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in WCON Electronics (Guangdong). The company's CEO Wenhua Li is the largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 11% of the stock.
我們注意到對WCON電子(廣東)的對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。公司的CEO李文華是最大的股東,持有34%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約18%和11%的股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構持股是一種評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究同樣可以達到此目的。對該股票的分析師覆蓋率略低,但不多。因此它有增加更多覆蓋機會。
Insider Ownership Of WCON Electronics (Guangdong)
WCON電子(廣東)的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of WCON Electronics (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥2.8b worth of shares in the CN¥4.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士持有廣東WCON電子有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們對公司擁有有效控制權。這意味着他們在這個價值48億人民幣的公司中擁有價值28億人民幣的股票。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能想免費查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in WCON Electronics (Guangdong). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有廣東WCON電子18%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能做出決策,但它肯定能對公司的運營產生真實影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司12%的股份。深入研究這點可能非常有價值。如果相關方,如內部人員,持有其中一傢俬營公司的利益,這應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for WCON Electronics (Guangdong) (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮不同的股東群體很重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如,我們發現WCON電子(廣東)有兩個警告信號(其中一個有點令人擔憂!),在您在這裏投資之前需要了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。