Institutions Profited After MultiPlan Corporation's (NYSE:MPLN) Market Cap Rose US$84m Last Week but Private Equity Firms Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After MultiPlan Corporation's (NYSE:MPLN) Market Cap Rose US$84m Last Week but Private Equity Firms Profited the Most
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- MultiPlan's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
- Recent purchases by insiders
- MultiPlan的主要股權投資公司持股表明,關鍵決策受到大型公衆股東的影響。
- 共有4位投資者擁有公司55%的控股權
- 近期內部人士的購買。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of MultiPlan Corporation (NYSE:MPLN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is private equity firms. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着MultiPlan公司(紐交所:MPLN),理解業務的所有權結構是重要的。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約47%,是股權投資公司。也就是說,這個群體如果股票上漲將獲得最大利益(或者在下跌時將失去最多)。
While private equity firms were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 73% price gain, institutions also received a 27% cut.
雖然股權投資公司是上週價格上漲73%後獲得最多利益的群體,但機構也獲得了27%的收益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MultiPlan.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注MultiPlan不同的股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MultiPlan?
機構持股告訴我們關於MultiPlan什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
MultiPlan already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at MultiPlan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
MultiPlan已經在股東名冊上有機構股東。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,依賴來自機構投資者的所謂驗證時最好保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看MultiPlan的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in MultiPlan. Our data shows that Hellman & Friedman LLC is the largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 7.7% of the stock.
對沖基金在MultiPlan的持股並不多。我們的數據顯示,Hellman & Friedman LLC是最大的股東,擁有33%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.9%和7.7%的股票。
On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步調查發現,前4大股東持有55%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中有重要發言權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒也同樣重要,以了解風向如何。儘管有一定的分析師覆蓋,但這家公司可能並沒有被廣泛報道。因此它在未來可能會獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of MultiPlan
MultiPlan的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in MultiPlan Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$198m, and insiders have US$12m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有MultiPlan公司的股票。該公司的市值僅爲19800萬美元,內部人士名下有價值1200萬美元的股票。有些人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致,儘管我們通常更希望看到內部人士持有更多的股份。但檢查這些內部人士是否在出售股票也許是值得的。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆普遍,尤其是零售投資者,持有公司12%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。儘管這部分持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 47%, private equity firms could influence the MultiPlan board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
持有47%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響MultiPlan的董事會。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵策略,幫助市場看到公司價值。另一方面,那些持有者可能在公司上市後選擇退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MultiPlan better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with MultiPlan (including 1 which is significant) .
考慮到不同的股東群體總是很重要。但爲了更好地了解MultiPlan,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。因此,您應該了解我們發現的與MultiPlan相關的2個警示信號(其中1個是重要的)。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。