Is The J. M. Smucker Company's (NYSE:SJM) ROE Of 6.9% Concerning?
Is The J. M. Smucker Company's (NYSE:SJM) ROE Of 6.9% Concerning?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM).
許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可以使用的各種指標。本文適合那些想要了解淨資產收益率(ROE)的人。爲了讓課堂內容貼近實際,我們將使用ROE更好地理解J.M. Smucker Company(紐交所:SJM)。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
股東權益回報率(ROE)是衡量公司價值增長和管理投資者資金有效性的一項指標。簡而言之,ROE展示了每一美元相對於股東投資所帶來的利潤。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益回報率?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
淨資產收益率可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for J. M. Smucker is:
因此,根據上述公式,J.M. Smucker的ROE爲:
6.9% = US$526m ÷ US$7.6b (Based on the trailing twelve months to October 2024).
6.9% = 52600萬美金 ÷ 76億美金(基於截至2024年10月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.07 in profit.
「收益」是每年的利潤。另一種理解方式是,對於每1美元的股權,公司能夠賺取0.07美元的利潤。
Does J. M. Smucker Have A Good ROE?
J. m. Smucker的ROE怎麼樣?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, J. M. Smucker has a lower ROE than the average (11%) in the Food industry classification.
評估公司ROE最簡單的方法是將其與同行業的平均水平進行比較。然而,這種方法僅僅作爲粗略的檢查是有用的,因爲同一行業分類下的公司差異較大。如以下圖表所示,J. m. Smucker的ROE低於食品行業分類的平均水平(11%)。
That certainly isn't ideal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. You can see the 2 risks we have identified for J. M. Smucker by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
這確實不是理想的。然而,低ROE並不總是壞事。如果公司的債務水平適中或較低,那麼仍然有機會通過金融槓桿來改善回報。當一家公司具有低ROE但高債務水平時,我們會非常謹慎,因爲風險太高。您可以通過訪問我們平台上的風險儀表板,免費觀看我們爲J. m. Smucker識別的兩個風險。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務對ROE的影響是怎樣的?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
大多數公司需要資金來增長其利潤。這筆資金可以來自發行股票、留存收益或債務。在前兩種選擇的情況下,ROE將反映這種資金的使用以實現增長。在後者的情況下,使用債務將改善回報,但不會改變股本。通過這種方式,使用債務將提升ROE,儘管業務的核心經濟情況保持不變。
Combining J. M. Smucker's Debt And Its 6.9% Return On Equity
結合J. m. Smucker的債務與其6.9%的ROE
J. M. Smucker clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.08. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
J. m. Smucker顯然使用了大量債務來提升回報,因爲它的負債與權益比率爲1.08。儘管使用了大量債務,其ROE依然相對較低;在我們看來,這不是一個好的結果。債務確實帶來額外風險,因此只有當公司從中產生可觀收益時,才真的是值得的。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率(ROE)對於比較不同企業的質量非常有用。能夠在沒有過多債務的情況下實現高ROE的公司通常質量較好。如果兩家公司的ROE相同,我通常會選擇負債較少的那一家。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.
話雖如此,儘管ROE是衡量業務質量的一個有用指標,但您需要考慮許多因素來判斷買入股票的合適價格。考慮其他因素是很重要的,如未來的利潤增長——以及未來需要多少投資。所以您可能想查看這個關於分析師預測的免費可視化。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,你可能會在其他地方找到一個了不起的投資機會。所以查看一下這個有趣公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。