share_log

Marriott International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 64% of the Company

Marriott International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 64% of the Company

萬豪酒店公司(納斯達克:MAR)受到持有公司64%股份的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  12/26 00:39

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marriott International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 23 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持有股份的比例較高意味着萬豪酒店的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有23位投資者在公司中擁有主導權,持有50%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Marriott International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 64% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了萬豪酒店, Inc. (納斯達克:MAR),那麼你必須查看其股東登記的構成。機構持有64%的股份,是公司最大股東。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marriott International.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了萬豪酒店不同的所有權集團。

big
NasdaqGS:MAR Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:MAR 所有權分解 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marriott International?

機構投資者持股情況給我們關於萬豪酒店的信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that Marriott International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Marriott International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到萬豪酒店確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一個很大部分。這暗示了在專業投資者中的一定可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構同時擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個參與方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。這種風險在缺乏增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到萬豪酒店的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住,故事總是有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:MAR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:MAR 2024年12月25日的盈利和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Marriott International. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.3% of shares outstanding. With 5.4% and 4.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Jwm Family Enterprises, LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者持有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以強有力地影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對萬豪酒店的對沖基金沒有進行顯著投資。先鋒集團目前是最大股東,持有7.3%的流通股份。貝萊德和Jwm Family Enterprises分別持有5.4%和4.6%的流通股份,排名第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東註冊中,我們可以看到前23大股東控制了50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構的持股是一種很好的方式,可以評估和篩選股票的預期表現。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,您可以很容易地查找預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Marriott International

萬豪國際的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Marriott International, Inc.. Insiders own US$6.6b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有萬豪酒店的股份。內部人士持有價值66億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時對他們是否在買入或賣出股份感興趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Marriott International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆擁有23%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們對萬豪酒店有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體未必能夠決定重大事項,但他們肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.9%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司4.9%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的具體所有者。有時候,內部人士或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私人公司對一家上市公司的股份感興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Marriott International that you should be aware of.

我發現了解一家公司的確切所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已識別出萬豪酒店的2個警告信號,您應該注意這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論