Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company
Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Woodward's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由於機構在股票中的大額持股,伍德沃德的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
- 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
A look at the shareholders of Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看伍德沃德公司(納斯達克:WWD)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體是最強大的。機構持有89%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Woodward.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於伍德沃德的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Woodward?
機構持有情況對伍德沃德有什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Woodward does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Woodward's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,伍德沃德確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴僅憑機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們也有可能犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到伍德沃德的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是還有更多的故事。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Woodward is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. With 9.6% and 8.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Eagle Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 伍德沃德並不被對沖基金所擁有。 公司的最大股東是貝萊德,持有9.8%。 先鋒集團和鷹資本管理公司的持股比例分別爲9.6%和8.0%,是第二和第三大股東。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了一些深入研究,發現十大股東約佔股東名冊的51%,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Woodward
伍德沃德的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Woodward, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$17m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有伍德沃德公司的股份不到1%。由於這是一個大公司,我們只會預期內部人士擁有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1700萬美元的股份。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Woodward. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有10%股份的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者構成,對伍德沃德有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能主導決策,但肯定能對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Woodward better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解伍德沃德,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
許多人發現深入分析公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這一詳細的歷史營業收入、營業收入和現金流的圖表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。