With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, JPMorgan Chase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
由於機構在該股票中擁有大量股份,摩根大通的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
共有25位投資者在該公司擁有45%的控股權。
分析師的預測和所有權數據有助於對業務前景形成清晰的認識。
Every investor in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位在摩根大通Alerian MLP指數ETN(紐交所:JPM)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構擁有73%的股份,是公司最大股東。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構可以接觸到大量資本,他們的市場動向往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,投資於該公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的強烈信心投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of JPMorgan Chase, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討摩根大通的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
NYSE:JPM Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
紐交所:JPm 所有權結構 2024年12月25日
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JPMorgan Chase?
機構所有權告訴我們關於摩根大通的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
JPMorgan Chase already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at JPMorgan Chase's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
摩根大通已經有機構在股份登記冊上。實際上,他們在公司中持有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一點,因爲機構有時也會進行糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看摩根大通的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
NYSE:JPM Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
紐交所:摩根大通收益和營業收入增長 2024年12月25日
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in JPMorgan Chase. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 7.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們能強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到,對摩根大通的對沖基金沒有意義的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有9.7%的流通股份。摩根大通的第二大和第三大股東分別是貝萊德和道富銀行,持有7.2%和4.5%的流通股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
在研究一家公司的機構持股時,可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的推薦也是一種好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師在關注該股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of JPMorgan Chase
摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同國家對內幕人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是被視爲內幕人士。管理層最終要對董事會負責。然而,管理者通常是執行董事會成員尤其當他們是創始人或首席執行官時,這並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$2.5b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,內幕人士以自己名義持有的摩根大通Alerian MLP指數ETN的股份不到1%。這是一個非常大的公司,因此內幕人士擁有大量股份的情況令人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持股比例不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值25億美金的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得檢查這些內幕人士是否有在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over JPMorgan Chase. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆以26%的持股比例,主要由個人投資者構成,對摩根大通有一定的影響力。這一持股規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand JPMorgan Chase better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for JPMorgan Chase you should be aware of.
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解摩根大通,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。恰好:我們發現了一個你應該注意的摩根大通的警示信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。