Is Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Using Too Much Debt?
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Studio City International Holdings Limited (NYSE:MSC) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過,'波動性遠非風險的同義詞。' 所以看起來聰明的資金知道,債務 - 通常與破產有關 - 是評估一個公司風險時非常重要的因素。重要的是,新濠影匯控股有限公司 (紐交所:MSC) 確實有債務。但是,股東應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務在企業能夠用新資本或自由現金流償還之前是有幫助的。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款方可能會控制企業。雖然這樣的情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債較重的公司因爲貸款方迫使它們以折價方式募集資本而永久稀釋股東權益。不過,通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率進行增長投資的企業的極好工具。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要結合其現金和債務進行查看。
How Much Debt Does Studio City International Holdings Carry?
新濠影匯控股有限公司的債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Studio City International Holdings had US$2.18b of debt in September 2024, down from US$2.43b, one year before. However, it does have US$113.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$2.06b.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,新濠影匯控股有限公司的債務爲21.8億美元,低於前年424億美元。然而,它有11320萬美元的現金抵消這部分債務,導致淨債務約爲20.6億美元。
A Look At Studio City International Holdings' Liabilities
新濠影匯控股負債概覽
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Studio City International Holdings had liabilities of US$152.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$2.16b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$113.2m as well as receivables valued at US$1.93m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$2.19b.
仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到新濠影匯控股在12個月內的負債爲15250萬美元,超過12個月的負債爲21.6億美元。抵消這些義務,它擁有11320萬美元的現金,以及在12個月內到期的應收款爲193萬美元。因此,它的負債超出了其現金和(短期)應收款的總和21.9億美元。
This deficit casts a shadow over the US$1.26b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Studio City International Holdings would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.
這一赤字如同巨人高聳於凡人之上,遮蔽了12.6億美元的公司。因此,我們無疑會密切關注其資產負債表。畢竟,如果新濠影匯控股今天必須償還債權人,它很可能需要進行大規模的再融資。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了衡量一家公司相對於其收益的債務水平,我們計算其淨負債與利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及其利息和稅項前利潤(EBIT)與其利息支出(利息支付比率)的比率。因此,我們考慮了包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務的情況。
Weak interest cover of 0.38 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 9.3 hit our confidence in Studio City International Holdings like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. One redeeming factor for Studio City International Holdings is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of US$50m, over the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Studio City International Holdings will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
0.38倍的利息覆蓋率和高達9.3的淨債務與EBITDA比率像一記重拳重創了我們對新濠影匯控股的信懇智能。這意味着我們認爲它承擔了沉重的債務負擔。新濠影匯控股的一個值得注意的因素是,在過去12個月內,它將去年的EBIT損失轉變爲5000萬美元的收益。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是最初要查看的地方。但您不能完全孤立地看待債務;因爲新濠影匯控股需要盈利來償還那部分債務。因此,在考慮債務時,查看盈利趨勢無疑是值得的。點擊這裏查看互動快照。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is backed by free cash flow. During the last year, Studio City International Holdings burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法滿足。因此,值得檢查利息和稅前利潤(EBIT)中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去一年裏,新濠影匯控股消耗了大量現金。儘管這可能是出於增長的支出,但這確實使債務風險更大。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Studio City International Holdings's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. Having said that, its ability to grow its EBIT isn't such a worry. We think the chances that Studio City International Holdings has too much debt a very significant. To us, that makes the stock rather risky, like walking through a dog park with your eyes closed. But some investors may feel differently. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Studio City International Holdings you should be aware of.
坦白說, 新濠影匯 的EBIT轉化爲自由現金流以及其在總負債上保持領先的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到相當不安。 話雖如此, 其EBIT增長的能力並不令人擔憂。 我們認爲,新濠影匯的債務過多的可能性非常顯著。 對我們來說,這讓該股票相當有風險,就像閉着眼睛走過狗公園一樣。但也有一些投資者可能有不同的看法。 毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學習到的大部分關於債務的知識。然而,最終每個公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。 舉個例子:我們發現了2個警示信號,提醒你關注 新濠影匯 。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。