share_log

Institutional Investors Are KeyCorp's (NYSE:KEY) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$555m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are KeyCorp's (NYSE:KEY) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$555m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是KeyCorp(紐交所:KEY)最大的投資者,且在上週市值增加了55500萬美元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  12/26 20:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in KeyCorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在KeyCorp的龐大持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重要影響。
  • 前13大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

Every investor in KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位在KeyCorp(紐交所:KEY)投資者都應該了解最有實力的股東群體。機構持有82%的股份,擁有公司最多的股票。換句話說,這個群體從他們對公司的投資中獲得的收益最多(或損失最多)。

Last week's 3.3% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 26%.

上週3.3%的漲幅意味着儘管公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。上週的增幅進一步提升了股東的一年回報,目前達到26%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of KeyCorp, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解KeyCorp的每種所有者類型,從下方的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:KEY Ownership Breakdown December 26th 2024
紐交所:KEY 2024年12月26日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About KeyCorp?

機構所有權告訴我們關於KeyCorp什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in KeyCorp. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of KeyCorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在KeyCorp擁有相當可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持謹慎。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,出現大幅股價下跌的情況並不罕見。因此,查看一下KeyCorp過往的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素也需要考慮。

big
NYSE:KEY Earnings and Revenue Growth December 26th 2024
紐交所:KEY 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月26日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in KeyCorp. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體發揮重要的影響力。對沖基金在KeyCorp的股份不多。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大股東是先鋒集團,持有11%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約9.2%的流通股份,第三大股東則擁有4.8%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前13大股東在公司中的合計持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of KeyCorp

KeyCorp的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of KeyCorp in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$67m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己名義擁有KeyCorp不到1%的股份。 這是一個非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有公司大比例的股份會令人驚訝。雖然他們的持股份額不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值6700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,觀察這些內部人士是買入還是賣出會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——在該公司擁有17%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體並不一定能決定大局,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand KeyCorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - KeyCorp has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解KeyCorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,風險 - KeyCorp有4個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論