Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Shareholders Have Earned a 60% CAGR Over the Last Five Years
Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Shareholders Have Earned a 60% CAGR Over the Last Five Years
We think all investors should try to buy and hold high quality multi-year winners. And highest quality companies can see their share prices grow by huge amounts. Don't believe it? Then look at the Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) share price. It's 960% higher than it was five years ago. If that doesn't get you thinking about long term investing, we don't know what will. It's also good to see the share price up 21% over the last quarter. It really delights us to see such great share price performance for investors.
我們認爲,所有投資者都應該嘗試買入並持有高質量的多年期贏家。最高質量的公司可以看到其股價大幅上漲。不相信?然後看看維捷控股有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:VRT)的股價。它比五年前高出960%。如果這不能讓你考慮長期投資,我們不知道會怎樣。股價在上個季度上漲了21%也是件好事。看到投資者如此出色的股價表現確實令我們高興。
With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.
考慮到這一點,值得一看公司的基本面是否是長期業績的驅動力,或者是否存在一些差異。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
不可否認的是,市場有時是有效的,但價格並不總是能反映基本的業務表現。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
During the last half decade, Vertiv Holdings Co became profitable. That kind of transition can be an inflection point that justifies a strong share price gain, just as we have seen here. Since the company was unprofitable five years ago, but not three years ago, it's worth taking a look at the returns in the last three years, too. Indeed, the Vertiv Holdings Co share price has gained 372% in three years. Meanwhile, EPS is up 57% per year. That makes the EPS growth rather close to the annualized share price gain of 68% over the same period. That suggests that the market sentiment around the company hasn't changed much over that time. Rather, the share price has approximately tracked EPS growth.
在過去的五年中,Vertiv控股公司實現了盈利。正如我們在這裏看到的那樣,這種轉變可能是一個轉折點,可以證明股價的強勁上漲是合理的。由於該公司在五年前(而不是三年前)無利可圖,因此過去三年的回報也值得一看。事實上,維捷控股公司的股價在三年內上漲了372%。同時,每股收益每年增長57%。這使得每股收益的增長相當接近同期68%的年化股價漲幅。這表明該公司周圍的市場情緒在那段時間內沒有太大變化。相反,股價大致追蹤了每股收益的增長。
The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
下圖顯示了 EPS 在一段時間內的跟蹤情況(如果你點擊圖片,你可以看到更多的細節)。
It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Vertiv Holdings Co's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
可能值得注意的是,首席執行官的薪水低於類似規模公司的中位數。但是,儘管首席執行官的薪酬總是值得檢查的,但真正重要的問題是公司未來能否增加收益。可能值得一看我們關於維捷控股公司收益、收入和現金流的免費報告。
What About Dividends?
那股息呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Vertiv Holdings Co, it has a TSR of 963% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
重要的是要考慮任何給定股票的股東總回報率和股價回報率。股東總回報率是一種回報計算方法,它考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設收到的任何股息都經過再投資)以及任何貼現資本籌集和分拆的計算價值。可以公平地說,股東總回報率爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的畫面。就維帖控股公司而言,其在過去5年的股東總回報率爲963%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
It's good to see that Vertiv Holdings Co has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 143% in the last twelve months. That's including the dividend. That's better than the annualised return of 60% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Vertiv Holdings Co better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that Vertiv Holdings Co is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
很高興看到維帝夫控股公司在過去十二個月中向股東提供了143%的總股東回報率。這包括股息。這比五年來60%的年化回報率要好,這意味着該公司最近的表現更好。持樂觀態度的人可能會將最近股東總回報率的改善視爲業務本身隨着時間的推移而變得更好。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地了解Vertiv Holdings Co,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。即便如此,請注意,Vertiv Holdings Co在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).
如果你想和管理層一起購買股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這份免費的公司清單。(提示:其中許多未被注意且估值誘人)。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報率。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。