Investing in Crocs (NASDAQ:CROX) Five Years Ago Would Have Delivered You a 163% Gain
Investing in Crocs (NASDAQ:CROX) Five Years Ago Would Have Delivered You a 163% Gain
Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ:CROX) shareholders might be concerned after seeing the share price drop 23% in the last quarter. But that scarcely detracts from the really solid long term returns generated by the company over five years. It's fair to say most would be happy with 163% the gain in that time. Generally speaking the long term returns will give you a better idea of business quality than short periods can. The more important question is whether the stock is too cheap or too expensive today.
卡駱馳公司(納斯達克:CROX)的股東在看到股價在上一季度下降了23%後,可能會感到擔憂。 但這幾乎不會影響公司在過去五年內所創造的非常可靠的長期回報。 可以公平地說,大多數人都會對這一時期獲得的163%的收益感到滿意。 一般來說,長期回報會比短期的更能反映業務的質量。 更重要的問題是,今天的股票是太便宜還是太貴。
With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.
鑑於此,值得看看該公司的基本面是否一直是長期業績的驅動因素,或者是否存在一些不一致之處。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
雖然市場是一個強大的定價機制,但股價反映的是投資者情緒,而不僅僅是基礎業務的表現。一種有缺陷但合理的評估公司情緒變化的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
During the last half decade, Crocs became profitable. That kind of transition can be an inflection point that justifies a strong share price gain, just as we have seen here. Given that the company made a profit three years ago, but not five years ago, it is worth looking at the share price returns over the last three years, too. We can see that the Crocs share price is down 14% in the last three years. In the same period, EPS is up 7.0% per year. So there seems to be a mismatch between the positive EPS growth and the change in the share price, which is down -5% per year.
在過去的五年中,卡駱馳開始實現盈利。 這種轉變可以成爲一個拐點,合理化股價大幅上漲,正如我們在這裏所看到的那樣。 考慮到公司在三年前盈利,而五年前尚未盈利,查看過去三年的股價回報也很有意義。 我們可以看到,卡駱馳的股價在過去三年中下降了14%。 在同一時期,每股收益每年增長了7.0%。 因此,似乎存在正的每股收益增長與股價變化之間的錯位,而股價每年下降了5%。
You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
您可以在下面看到EPS如何隨時間變化(點擊圖片可以發現具體數值)。
It's probably worth noting we've seen significant insider buying in the last quarter, which we consider a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..
值得注意的是,我們在過去一個季度看到顯著的內部人士購入,我們認爲這是一個積極的信號。另一方面,我們認爲營業收入和收益趨勢是更有意義的業務衡量標準。在買入或賣出股票之前,我們始終建議仔細檢查歷史增長趨勢,這裏有相關信息..
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Crocs provided a TSR of 19% over the last twelve months. Unfortunately this falls short of the market return. If we look back over five years, the returns are even better, coming in at 21% per year for five years. It may well be that this is a business worth popping on the watching, given the continuing positive reception, over time, from the market. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Crocs (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
卡駱馳在過去的十二個月中提供了19%的總回報率。不幸的是,這低於市場回報率。如果我們回顧過去五年,回報率甚至更好,達到了每年21%。考慮到市場對該業務的持續積極反響,這可能是一個值得關注的業務。雖然市場狀況對股價可能有不同的影響,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現卡駱馳有兩個警告信號(其中一個讓我們不太舒服!),在這裏投資之前你應該意識到這些。
Crocs is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.
卡駱馳並不是唯一被內部人士購買的股票。所以請看看這個免費的吸引估值的小盤公司名單,這些公司正在被內部人士購買。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。