share_log

ReAlpha Tech Corp.'s (NASDAQ:AIRE) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Giri Devanur, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 108% Last Week

ReAlpha Tech Corp.'s (NASDAQ:AIRE) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Giri Devanur, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 108% Last Week

ReAlpha Tech CORP.(納斯達克:AIRE)的最看好的內部人士是首席執行官Giri Devanur,他們的持股價值上週上漲了108%。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/28 08:20

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • reAlpha Tech's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 60% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Giri Devanur)
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • reAlpha Tech的顯著內部持股表明公司擴張的固有利益
  • 60%的公司股份由單一股東(Giri Devanur)持有
  • 通過公司的過去業績數據和股權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。

Every investor in reAlpha Tech Corp. (NASDAQ:AIRE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 82% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位在reAlpha Tech CORP.(納斯達克:AIRE)投資的人都應該關注最強大的股東群體。而擁有最大份額的群體是內部個人股東,持股比例爲82%。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中可能獲得最多的收益(或承擔最多的損失)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$164m market cap following a 108% gain in the stock.

因此,上週內部人士表現最佳,因爲公司在股票上漲108%後,市值達到了16400萬美元。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of reAlpha Tech.

在下方的圖表中,我們放大了reAlpha Tech的不同股東群體。

big
NasdaqCM:AIRE Ownership Breakdown December 28th 2024
納斯達克:AIRE 股權結構 2024年12月28日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About reAlpha Tech?

缺乏機構持股對reAlpha Tech意味着什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們通常不看到機構投資者持有非常風險高、流動性低或非常小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到沒有機構註冊的大公司,但這並不常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. reAlpha Tech's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

沒有機構持有公司股份可能有多種原因。通常,小型新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理無法在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。或者,可能有某些原因使機構投資者遠離該公司。reAlpha Tech的盈利和營業收入記錄(下文)可能對機構投資者沒有吸引力——或者他們根本沒有仔細研究這項業務。

big
NasdaqCM:AIRE Earnings and Revenue Growth December 28th 2024
納斯達克CM:AIRE 2024年12月28日的盈利和營業收入增長

reAlpha Tech is not owned by hedge funds. With a 60% stake, CEO Giri Devanur is the largest shareholder. This essentially means that they have significant control over the outcome or future of the company, which is why insider ownership is usually looked upon favourably by prospective buyers. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

reAlpha Tech不被對沖基金所擁有。CEO Giri Devanur持有60%的股份,是最大的股東。這基本上意味着他們對公司的結果或未來擁有重要的控制權,這也是爲什麼內部持股通常受到潛在買家的青睞。爲了提供一些背景,第二大股東持有約6.4%的流通股份,第三大股東則持有5.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的觀點以了解市場風向同樣是有意義的。雖然有分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of reAlpha Tech

reAlpha Tech的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of reAlpha Tech Corp.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$135m stake in this US$164m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有reAlpha Tech CORP.大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。因此,他們在這個價值爲16400萬美元的業務中擁有13500萬美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是很不錯的。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否最近有進行買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over reAlpha Tech. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆以17%的股權持有,主要由個人投資者組成,對reAlpha Tech有一定的影響力。這種持股規模雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - reAlpha Tech has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮不同的股東群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如風險——我們認爲reAlpha Tech有4個警告信號(以及2個稍顯令人擔憂的),你應該了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論