share_log

Retail Investors Who Hold 50% of Quantum Corporation (NASDAQ:QMCO) Gained 54%, Institutions Profited as Well

Retail Investors Who Hold 50% of Quantum Corporation (NASDAQ:QMCO) Gained 54%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有量子公司(納斯達克:QMCO)50%股票的散戶投資者獲得了54%的收益,機構也獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/28 22:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Quantum by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 散戶投資者對Quantum的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股份
  • 內部人士最近已出售

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Quantum Corporation (NASDAQ:QMCO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了量子公司(納斯達克股票代碼:QMCO),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲50%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Following a 54% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 27% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

繼上週股價上漲54%之後,散戶投資者獲利最多,但擁有27%股票的機構也將從漲幅中獲益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Quantum.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Quantum的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqGM:QMCO Ownership Breakdown December 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:QMCO 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 28 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Quantum?

關於量子,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。

Quantum already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Quantum, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Quantum已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Quantum過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGM:QMCO Earnings and Revenue Growth December 28th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:QMCO 收益和收入增長 2024 年 12 月 28 日

It looks like hedge funds own 18% of Quantum shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Pacific Investment Management Company LLC with 11% of shares outstanding. Long Focus Capital Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 9.9% of common stock, and ADK Capital LLC holds about 7.9% of the company stock. In addition, we found that James Lerner, the CEO has 1.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

看來對沖基金擁有量子18%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是太平洋投資管理有限責任公司,已發行股份的11%。Long Focus Capital Management LLC是第二大股東,擁有9.9%的普通股,AdK Capital LLC持有該公司約7.9%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官詹姆斯·勒納以其名義分配了1.5%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據後發現,前25名股東共持有不到一半的股份,這表明在很大一部分小股東中,沒有一個單一股東佔多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,它可能會在未來獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Quantum

量子的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Quantum Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$18m worth of stock in the US$327m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有量子公司的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值3.27億美元的公司價值1800萬美元的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Quantum. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有50%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Quantum有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Quantum is showing 6 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those shouldn't be ignored...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,Quantum在我們的投資分析中顯示了6個警告信號,其中3個不容忽視...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論