Institutional Owners May Ignore Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688099) Recent CN¥1.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688099) Recent CN¥1.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 由於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前六大股東持有公司51%的股份
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 38% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
爲了了解誰真正控制着晶晨股份(上海)有限公司(SHSE:688099),了解該業務的所有權結構是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的集團,大約佔38%,就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大收益(或者在出現下跌時損失最大)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to CN¥32b last week. However, the 21% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
機構投資者是上週公司市值降至320億人民幣後受影響最大的群體。然而,給股東帶來的21%的年度回報可能減輕了一些打擊。然而,我們假設他們會留意未來的弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd.
在下圖中,我們關注晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd?
機構持股對我們了解晶晨股份(上海)有限公司有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的可信度。但我們不能單靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看晶晨股份(上海)有限公司過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. Amlogic (Hong Kong) Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. and China Asset Management Co. Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.6%.
對沖基金在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股票不多。晶晨股份(香港)有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有26%的流通股份。第二和第三大股東分別是AEGON-工業基金管理有限公司和中國資產管理有限公司,持有相等數量的股份,各佔6.6%。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更多的挖掘,發現前六大股東大約佔股東註冊的51%,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,從而在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd
晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥3.2m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有的晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股份少於1%。不過,我們注意到,內部人士可能通過一傢俬營公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可以在不持有太多比例股份的情況下,擁有公司的相當大權益。在這種情況下,他們持有約320萬人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,近期的買賣同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司27%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這一群體不一定能決定公司事務,但確實可以對公司運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有34%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私營公司的所有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過一個獨立的私營公司對一家上市公司的股份有投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
考慮不同持有公司股份的群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解晶晨股份(上海)有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,風險 - 我們認爲晶晨股份(上海)有限公司有 3 個警告信號,您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。