share_log

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

NewMarket公司(紐交所代號NEU),股份擁有率高達64%,主要由機構投資者持有。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/29 22:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies NewMarket's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 17% of NewMarket is held by insiders
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着NewMarket的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有8位投資者在公司中擁有50%的控股權。
  • 17%的NewMarket由內部人士持有。

A look at the shareholders of NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察NewMarket Corporation(紐交所:NEU)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有最大的股份,持股比例達64%。換句話說,該群體面臨最大上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構擁有大量資金和研究能力,機構持股在個別投資者中往往具有很大的影響力。因此,投資者在一家公司擁有相當數量的機構資金通常被視爲一個可取的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of NewMarket, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地探討NewMarket的每種所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。

big
NYSE:NEU Ownership Breakdown December 29th 2024
紐交所:NEU 持股結構 2024年12月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewMarket?

機構持股情況對NewMarket意味着什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

We can see that NewMarket does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NewMarket, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到NewMarket確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但是,我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時出售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看NewMarket過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:NEU Earnings and Revenue Growth December 29th 2024
紐交所:NEU 2024年12月29日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in NewMarket. Bank of America Corporation, Asset Management Arm is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Bruce Gottwald is the second largest shareholder owning 9.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 7.5% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Thomas Gottwald is the owner of 4.4% of the company's shares.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以集體擁有顯著的權力。我們注意到對NewMarket的對沖基金投資並不重要。美國銀行的資產管理部門目前是公司最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。布魯斯·戈特瓦爾德是第二大股東,擁有9.7%的普通股,而先鋒集團持有大約7.5%的公司股票。此外,首席執行官托馬斯·戈特瓦爾德擁有公司的4.4%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8大股東佔據了超過一半的股份登記,幾個較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,可以更深入地理解股票的預期表現。就我們所知,似乎沒有分析師對該公司的覆蓋,因此它可能在雷達下飛行。

Insider Ownership Of NewMarket

NewMarket的內部股權持有情況。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of NewMarket Corporation. Insiders own US$852m worth of shares in the US$5.1b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有NewMarket Corporation一個合理的股份比例。內部人士持有價值85200萬美元的股票,這家公司市值51億美元。這非常有意義。看到這樣的投資水平非常好。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入行爲。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - NewMarket has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮不同的擁有公司群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如風險 - 我們認爲NewMarket有1個警告信號,你應該注意。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論