AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.'s (HKG:2018) Largest Shareholders Are Retail Investors With 39% Ownership, Insiders Own 37%
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.'s (HKG:2018) Largest Shareholders Are Retail Investors With 39% Ownership, Insiders Own 37%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- AAC Technologies Holdings' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders own 37% of AAC Technologies Holdings
- AAC科技控股的主要零售投資者的持有情況表明,關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響。
- 總共有6位投資者擁有公司50%的控股權
- 內部人士持有AAC科技控股37%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看AAC科技控股公司(HKG:2018)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權勢。而持有最大份額的團體是零售投資者,持有39%的股份。換句話說,該團體面臨最大上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 37% of the company's stockholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.
另一方面,個人內部人士佔公司股東的37%。機構通常會持有大公司的股票,我們預計在較小的公司中看到內部人士擁有相當比例的股票。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AAC Technologies Holdings.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於AAC科技控股的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AAC Technologies Holdings?
機構所有權告訴我們關於AAC科技控股什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AAC Technologies Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AAC Technologies Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者在AAC科技控股中有相當的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看AAC科技控股的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
AAC Technologies Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Chun Yuan Wu is currently the largest shareholder, with 22% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 4.7% of the stock. Zhengmin Pan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
AAC科技控股並不被對沖基金擁有。 吳春元目前是最大的股東,持有22%的流通股。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約15%和4.7%的股票。 第二大股東潘正敏同時也是首席執行官。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步深入挖掘,發現6位主要股東大約佔註冊股份的50%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of AAC Technologies Holdings
AAC科技控股的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$17b stake in this HK$46b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在AAC科技控股有限公司持有大量股份。 看到內部人士在這家460億港元的公司中持有170億港元的股份是非常有趣的。 看到這樣的投資水平令人振奮。 您可以在這裏查看那些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司39%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這一群體不一定能夠決定一切,但他們無疑能對公司的運營產生真實的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張互動圖表,查看過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。