Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%
Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alcoa implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在美國鋁業公司的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重要影響力。
- 頂級22名股東持有51%的業務。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察美國鋁業公司(紐交所:AA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。機構持有71%的股份,擁有公司最多的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構投資者擁有巨大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,機構投資在公司中的佔比被普遍視爲積極特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alcoa.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了美國鋁業公司的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alcoa?
機構持股對美國鋁業公司意味着什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alcoa. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Alcoa, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在美國鋁業公司中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對該股票進行了審查,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會錯。而且,如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售一隻股票,通常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,查看美國鋁業公司過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Alcoa. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Eagle Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們能夠強力影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在美國鋁業公司的股份並不多。我們的數據表明,先鋒集團是最大的股東,持股比例爲10%。貝萊德和鷹資本管理公司分別以10%和6.0%的持股比例位列第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股權數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前22大股東的整體持股比例爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Alcoa
美國鋁業公司的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Alcoa Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$71m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士在美國鋁業公司以自己的名義持有不足1%的股份。由於公司規模龐大,我們不期望內部人士擁有大量股份。他們總共持有7100萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部人士持股總是好的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Alcoa. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有美國鋁業公司28%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能夠決定公司的實施,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生真實影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Alcoa , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如,投資風險始終存在。 我們已經發現美國鋁業公司有兩個警告信號,理解它們應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。