The Recent Drop in Prices Must Have Disappointed GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) Institutional Investors Who Own 79% of the Shares
The Recent Drop in Prices Must Have Disappointed GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) Institutional Investors Who Own 79% of the Shares
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in GE Vernova implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在GE Vernova的重大持股意味着它們對公司股票價格有重要影響
- 業務的50%由前17位股東持有。
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着GE Vernova Inc. (紐交所:GEV),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有79%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Unfortunately, institutional ended up on the other end of the spectrum as market cap fell by US$3.1b.
不幸的是,機構最終處於光譜的另一端,因爲市值下降了31億美元。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about GE Vernova.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於GE Vernova的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GE Vernova?
機構持股對GE Vernova的意義是什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that GE Vernova does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GE Vernova, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到GE Vernova確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的較大部分。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售某隻股票,通常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,檢查GE Vernova過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in GE Vernova. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 10.0% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在GE Vernova的股份不多。根據我們的數據,最大股東是先鋒集團,持有10.0%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.9%和6.5%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到前17位股東控制了50%的所有權,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數權益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of GE Vernova
GE Vernova 的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of GE Vernova Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$32m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據表明,內部人士在GE Vernova Inc.旗下以自己的名義持有不到1%的股份。由於公司規模龐大,我們不期望內部人士持有較大比例的股票。總的來說,他們持有3200萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在購買股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GE Vernova. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有21%的股份,公衆,主要是個人投資者,在GE Vernova有一定的影響力。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand GE Vernova better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for GE Vernova you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解GE Vernova,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現了1個你應該注意的GE Vernova的警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。