The Recent 26% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Lin Yang's Week, Vesync Co., Ltd's (HKG:2148) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 26% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Lin Yang's Week, Vesync Co., Ltd's (HKG:2148) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant insider control over Vesync implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 68% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 對VESYNC的顯著內部控制表明了對公司增長的既得利益
- 共有2位投資者擁有公司68%的股份
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of Vesync Co., Ltd (HKG:2148) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 70% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看VESYNC有限公司(HKG:2148)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。擁有最大份額的群體是個人內部人士,擁有70%的股份。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$6.0b market cap following a 26% gain in the stock.
結果是,上週內部人士得分最高,因爲公司在股票上漲26%後市值達到了60億港元。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vesync, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解VESYNC的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vesync?
機構所有權告訴我們關於VESYNC什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Vesync, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
由於機構僅持有VESYNC的一小部分,許多人可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但很明顯,有些人考慮過,並且他們足夠喜歡它來買入。如果業務從這裏變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構願意買入的情況。當多個機構投資者想買入股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可以是未來增長的一個指標,但沒有保證。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vesync. With a 36% stake, CEO Lin Yang is the largest shareholder. With 32% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Yuzheng Yang and Swcs Trust Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到對VESYNC的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。 CEO林揚持有36%的股份,是最大的股東。 餘正揚和SWCS Trust Limited分別持有32%和6%的流通股,成爲第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩大股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們在影響公司決策方面有相當大的權力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Vesync
VESYNC的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Vesync Co., Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$4.2b worth of shares in the HK$6.0b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
似乎內部人士擁有超過VESYNC有限公司股票的一半。這給了他們很大的權力。這意味着他們持有價值港幣42億的股份,而該公司的市值爲港幣60億。這相當有意義。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望發現(免費的)他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Vesync. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆擁有23%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對VESYNC有一定的影響力。儘管這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.0%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司6.0%的股份。私人公司可能與相關方有關。有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而非作爲個人身份在一家上市公司中擁有利益。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Vesync that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現了解一個公司的具體擁有者非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了一個VESYNC的警告信號,在您投資之前應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。