Soochow Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601555) Market Cap Surged CN¥1.3b Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Soochow Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601555) Market Cap Surged CN¥1.3b Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Soochow Securities by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
- 12% of Soochow Securities is held by Institutions
- 散戶對東吳證券的重大控制意味着公衆在影響管理和治理相關決策方面具有更大的權力。
- 前25大股東持有該公司48%的股份。
- 12%的東吳證券股份由機構持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Soochow Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601555), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正掌控東吳證券有限公司(SHSE:601555),理解該業務的所有權結構是非常重要的。我們可以看到,散戶在公司中佔有51%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該團體將獲得最大的利益(或在股市下跌時損失最多)。
Clearly, retail investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥1.3b last week.
顯然,在公司市值上週增長了13億人民幣後,散戶投資者獲得了最大的收益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Soochow Securities, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解東吳證券股權的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Soochow Securities?
機構所有權告訴我們有關東吳證券的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Soochow Securities. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Soochow Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在東吳證券中擁有相當的股份。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的信譽。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有同一股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到東吳證券的歷史營業收入和收益,但請記住,故事總是比這更復雜。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Soochow Securities. Suzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.5% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對東吳證券股權的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。 蘇州市財政局目前是公司的最大股東,持有27%的流通股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有4.5%和3.0%的流通股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構持股是一種評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究同樣可以達到此目的。對該股票的分析師覆蓋率略低,但不多。因此它有增加更多覆蓋機會。
Insider Ownership Of Soochow Securities
東吳證券的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否個人持有股票。董事會成員至少持有一些個人股份是比較異常的,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。下一步可以檢查一下CEO的薪酬。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 51% stake in Soochow Securities, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公衆通常是個人投資者,他們持有東吳證券51%的股份,這表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權的規模賦予了公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以,也可能會影響高管薪酬、分紅政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 38%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司持有38%的已發行股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過一個獨立的私營公司對一家上市公司股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Soochow Securities better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Soochow Securities , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到不同的股東群體擁有公司的股份是很有必要的。但要更好地理解東吳證券股權,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如,始終存在的投資風險。我們已識別出東吳證券股權的一個警示信號,理解這些信號應該成爲您投資流程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。