share_log

Should You Be Excited About Churchill Downs Incorporated's (NASDAQ:CHDN) 37% Return On Equity?

Should You Be Excited About Churchill Downs Incorporated's (NASDAQ:CHDN) 37% Return On Equity?

你應該對Churchill Downs Incorporated的(納斯達克: CHDN)37%的股本回報率感到興奮嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/31 05:09

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN), by way of a worked example.

許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可以用到的各種指標。本文是爲那些想了解股東權益回報率(ROE)的人準備的。我們將通過一個具體的例子,使用ROE來分析Churchill Downs Incorporated(納斯達克:CHDN)。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.

股本回報率或ROE是股東需要考慮的重要因素,因爲它告訴他們自己的資本是如何有效地被再投資的。簡單來說,它衡量的是公司相對於股東權益的盈利能力。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股本回報率?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

淨資產收益率可以通過以下公式計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股東權益回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Churchill Downs is:

因此,基於以上公式,Churchill Downs的ROE爲:

37% = US$414m ÷ US$1.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

37% = 41400萬美元 ÷ 11億美金(基於截至2024年9月的十二個月)。

The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.37 in profit.

「回報」是指年度利潤。可以這樣理解,公司的股東資本每有1美元,它就賺取了0.37美元的利潤。

Does Churchill Downs Have A Good ROE?

丘奇樂賽道的ROE好嗎?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Churchill Downs has a better ROE than the average (12%) in the Hospitality industry.

通過將公司ROE與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量它的好壞。 重要的是,這遠不是一個完美的衡量標準,因爲同一行業分類內的公司差異顯著。 從下圖可以清楚看出,丘奇樂賽道的ROE優於酒店行業的平均水平(12%)。

big
NasdaqGS:CHDN Return on Equity December 31st 2024
納斯達克交易所:CHDN 2024年12月31日的權益回報率

That's what we like to see. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk.

這正是我們想看到的。但是,高ROE並不總是表示高盈利能力,尤其是當公司利用大量負債來融資,這可能會提高其ROE,但高槓杆將使公司面臨風險。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?

Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

大多數公司需要資金——來自某個地方——來增加利潤。 投資的現金可以來自前一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映這筆現金用於企業投資的情況。在後兩種情況下,債務用於增長將提高回報,但不會影響總股本。這將使ROE看起來比沒有使用債務時更好。

Combining Churchill Downs' Debt And Its 37% Return On Equity

結合Churchill Downs的債務和其37%的淨資產收益率

We think Churchill Downs uses a significant amount of debt to maximize its returns, as it has a significantly higher debt to equity ratio of 4.34. While its ROE is no doubt quite impressive, it could give a false impression about the company's returns given that its huge debt could be boosting those returns.

我們認爲Churchill Downs使用了大量債務來最大化其收益,因爲其債務與股本比率高達4.34。儘管其ROE確實相當令人印象深刻,但由於其巨額債務可能在提升這些收益,這可能會給人一種錯誤的印象。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

淨資產收益率是我們比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。在我們看來,最高質量的公司即使負債較低也具有高淨資產收益率。如果兩家公司債務股本比率相近,而其中一家ROE更高,我通常會更傾向於ROE更高的那家公司。

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.

但是當一個業務質量高時,市場通常會把它推升到一個反映這一點的價格。還必須考慮利潤可能增長的速度相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期的關係。因此,您可能想看看這個數據豐富的公司預測的互動圖表。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

如果你更願意查看另一家公司——一家潛在的財務狀況優秀的公司——那麼一定不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費列表,這些公司有高股本回報率和低負債。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論