share_log

With 81% Institutional Ownership, The GEO Group, Inc. (NYSE:GEO) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 81% Institutional Ownership, The GEO Group, Inc. (NYSE:GEO) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

在81%的機構持股下,The GEO Group, Inc. (紐交所:GEO) 是大投行們的寵兒。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/31 07:47

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in GEO Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在GEO集團的重大持有表明他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
  • 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近出售了股票。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of The GEO Group, Inc. (NYSE:GEO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着GEO集團公司(紐交所:GEO),理解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。持有最大份額的是機構,他們擁有81%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of GEO Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解GEO集團每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:GEO Ownership Breakdown December 31st 2024
紐交所:GEO所有權結構 2024年12月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GEO Group?

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GEO Group?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GEO Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GEO Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在GEO集團中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,和其他人一樣。當兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時賣出某隻股票時,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看GEO集團過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)是值得的。當然,請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:GEO Earnings and Revenue Growth December 31st 2024
紐約證券交易所:GEO 2024年12月31日的收益和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GEO Group. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 我們注意到對沖基金在GEO集團沒有有意義的投資。 該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,擁有15%的股份。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有11%和5.2%的流通股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步檢查發現,公司超過一半的股份由前10大股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of GEO Group

Insider Ownership Of GEO Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in The GEO Group, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$138m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有The GEO Group, Inc.的股份。它是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約13800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士進行如此水平的投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有購買。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GEO Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆持有16%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們在GEO Group中有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不能完全掌握大權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that GEO Group is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是很重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,GEO集團顯示出5個警告信號,其中1個信號有些令人不快...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論