CRISPR Therapeutics AG's (NASDAQ:CRSP) Recent 4.5% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
CRISPR Therapeutics AG's (NASDAQ:CRSP) Recent 4.5% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies CRISPR Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著的高機構持有量意味着CRISPR Therapeutics的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 總共有14位投資者在公司中擁有51%的多數股權。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of CRISPR Therapeutics AG (NASDAQ:CRSP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 73% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着CRISPR Therapeutics AG(納斯達克:CRSP),了解公司的 ownership 結構是很重要的。持有最大股份的群體是機構,佔73%的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 4.5% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 38% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in CRISPR Therapeutics' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
機構投資者上週看到其持有的資產價值下降了4.5%。不必多說,這一近期損失進一步加大了股東38%的年損失,尤其是對於這一類別的股東來說,可能不會太好受。機構通常被稱爲「聰明資金」,他們對股票價格的波動有很大的影響。因此,如果CRISPR Therapeutics的股價繼續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到迫使賣出該股票的壓力,這對個人投資者來說可能不是理想的選擇。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CRISPR Therapeutics.
我們可以更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CRISPR Therapeutics的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CRISPR Therapeutics?
機構所有權對CRISPR Therapeutics的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that CRISPR Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CRISPR Therapeutics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到CRISPR Therapeutics確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間對一隻股票的看法發生變化,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看CRISPR Therapeutics的營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CRISPR Therapeutics. ARK Investment Management LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Capital Research and Management Company is the second largest shareholder owning 9.8% of common stock, and Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. holds about 7.0% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在CRISPR Therapeutics中的持股不多。ARK投資管理公司目前是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。Capital Research and Management Company是第二大股東,擁有9.8%的普通股,而Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd.持有大約7.0%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前14名股東在公司中的合計持股爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有顯著控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of CRISPR Therapeutics
CRISPR Therapeutics的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CRISPR Therapeutics AG in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$15m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據表明,內部人士在CRISPR Therapeutics AG中以個人名義擁有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1500萬美元的股票。絕對價值可能比比例股份更重要。看到董事會成員擁有股票是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CRISPR Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公共持股比例爲26%,公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在CRISPR Therapeutics中擁有一定程度的影響力。雖然這部分持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CRISPR Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for CRISPR Therapeutics you should be aware of.
始終值得思考不同群體擁有的公司股份。但爲了更好地理解CRISPR Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。案例說明:我們發現了CRISPR Therapeutics的2個警告信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。