Is Sichuan Expressway (HKG:107) A Risky Investment?
Is Sichuan Expressway (HKG:107) A Risky Investment?
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Sichuan Expressway Company Limited (HKG:107) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾說,'波動性遠不等於風險。' 因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,很明顯你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到四川成渝公司(HKG:107)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但股東是否應該擔心其使用債務的問題呢?
When Is Debt A Problem?
何時債務成爲問題?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務對企業有幫助,直到企業在償還債務時遇到困難,無論是通過新資本還是自由現金流。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是 '創造性破壞' 的過程,失敗的企業會被其銀行毫不留情地清算。然而,一個更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是它不得不以低價募資新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東的權益。儘管如此,最常見的情況是公司相對合理地管理其債務,並使其受益。當我們檢查債務水平時,首先要考慮現金和債務水平的結合。
What Is Sichuan Expressway's Debt?
四川成渝的債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Sichuan Expressway had CN¥39.8b of debt, up from CN¥37.8b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had CN¥2.71b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥37.1b.
正如您在下面看到的,到2024年9月底,四川成渝的債務爲398億人民幣,高於一年前的378億人民幣。點擊圖片了解更多細節。 然而,它也有27.1億人民幣的現金,因此其淨債務爲371億人民幣。
How Strong Is Sichuan Expressway's Balance Sheet?
四川成渝的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Sichuan Expressway had liabilities of CN¥6.84b falling due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥36.4b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥2.71b and CN¥620.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥39.9b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
從最新的資產負債表來看,四川成渝的短期債務爲68.4億人民幣,而長期債務爲364億人民幣。另一方面,公司現金爲27.1億人民幣,短期應收款爲62040萬人民幣。因此,公司的負債總額爲399億人民幣,高於其現金和短期應收款的總和。
This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥14.2b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Sichuan Expressway would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.
這一赤字給這家142億人民幣的公司罩上了陰影,就像一個巨人俯視凡人。因此,我們毫無疑問會密切關注它的資產負債表。畢竟,如果四川成渝今天需要償還債務,可能會需要進行一次重大再融資。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看公司的淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息費用的能力(利息保障率),來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力的情況。這種方法的優勢在於,我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(通過淨債務與EBITDA的比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息費用(通過其利息保障率)。
Sichuan Expressway has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 10.2 which suggests a meaningful debt load. But the good news is that it boasts fairly comforting interest cover of 3.0 times, suggesting it can responsibly service its obligations. Notably, Sichuan Expressway's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, which isn't ideal given the debt load. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Sichuan Expressway will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
四川成渝的債務與EBITDA比率相對較高,爲10.2,這表明債務負擔沉重。好消息是,其利息保障比爲3.0倍,表明公司能夠合理地償還義務。值得注意的是,過去一年四川成渝的EBIT基本持平,這對於如此高的債務負擔來說並不理想。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是首要之地。但不能孤立地看待債務,因爲四川成渝需要盈利來償還這筆債務。因此,如果您想進一步了解其盈利,查看這張長期盈利趨勢圖可能是值得的。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Sichuan Expressway burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
但我們最終考慮的因素也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要現金流。因此,值得檢查一下EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,四川成渝消耗了大量現金。儘管這可能是由於增長支出的結果,但這確實使得債務更加風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Sichuan Expressway's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. It's also worth noting that Sichuan Expressway is in the Infrastructure industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Sichuan Expressway has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Sichuan Expressway (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.
坦白說,四川成渝的EBIt轉爲自由現金流的能力以及其在總負債方面表現良好的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不安。但至少它的EBIt增長率還不錯。值得注意的是,四川成渝所在的行業板塊是製造行業,這通常被認爲是相當穩健的。考慮到上述所有因素,四川成渝似乎債務過多。這種風險性對某些人而言可以接受,但顯然並不適合我們。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上學到了很多關於債務的知識。但最終,每家公司可能都存在資產負債表外的風險。這些風險可能很難察覺。每家公司都有這些風險,而我們發現四川成渝有2個警告信號(其中1個不應被忽視!),你應該了解一下。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。