share_log

Winner Technology Co., Inc.'s (SZSE:300609) Last Week's 18% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Winner Technology Co., Inc.'s (SZSE:300609) Last Week's 18% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

匯納科技有限公司(SZSE:300609)上週18%的下跌一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/31 17:33

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Winner Technology's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 23% of Winner Technology is held by insiders
  • 匯納科技的重大零售投資者持股顯示,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 前25名股東持有該業務的42%。
  • 23%的匯納科技股份由內部人士持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Winner Technology Co., Inc. (SZSE:300609), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 58% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制着匯納科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300609),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。零售投資者持有58%的股份,是公司中最大股東。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大收益(如果市場下跌,他們將損失最多)。

While insiders who own 23% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥3.0b last week,retail investors took the most losses.

在市場市值上週下降至30億人民幣後,持有23%的內部人士受到壓力,而散戶投資者蒙受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Winner Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入了解匯納科技每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SZSE:300609 Ownership Breakdown January 1st 2025
深交所:300609 股權結構 2025年1月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Winner Technology?

機構持有的股份告訴我們關於匯納科技什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Winner Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Winner Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在匯納科技中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。多個機構擁有同一只股票時,總是存在他們在進行「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會爭相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面查看匯納科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。

big
SZSE:300609 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 1st 2025
SZSE:300609 盈利和營業收入增長 2025年1月1日

Winner Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Hongjun Zhang is the largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. Shanghai Liangyuan Asset Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.5% of common stock, and Hangzhou Jindi Commercial Management Co., Ltd. holds about 4.2% of the company stock.

匯納科技並不被對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,張洪軍是最大股東,持有22%的流通股份。上海量源資產管理有限公司是第二大股東,持有4.5%的普通股,而杭州金地商業管理有限公司持有約4.2%的公司股票。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。 通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。 目前我們沒有發現對該股票的分析師覆蓋,因此該公司的持股不太可能廣泛。

Insider Ownership Of Winner Technology

匯納科技的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Winner Technology Co., Inc.. Insiders own CN¥689m worth of shares in the CN¥3.0b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有匯納科技股份有限公司合理比例的股份。內部人士在這家市值30億人民幣的公司中擁有價值68900萬人民幣的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的對齊,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是該企業的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Winner Technology. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有58%的匯納科技股份。這樣的持股規模給予公衆投資者一些集體力量。他們能夠並且可能影響高管薪酬、分紅政策和 proposed 業務收購的決策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 4.8%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司持有4.8%的流通股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私營公司的所有者。有時候,內部人士或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私營公司在一家上市公司中擁有股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Winner Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Winner Technology (2 are potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解匯納科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了匯納科技的3個警告信號(其中2個可能是嚴重的!),在這裏投資之前你應該了解這些。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您也可能會在其他地方找到一個絕佳的投資。請查看這個免費的有趣公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論