Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600801) Top Owners Are Public Companies With 45% Stake, While 28% Is Held by Individual Investors
Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600801) Top Owners Are Public Companies With 45% Stake, While 28% Is Held by Individual Investors
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Huaxin Cement by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 2 shareholders own 57% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 公衆公司對華新水泥的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更大的影響力。
- 前兩大股東持有公司57%的股份
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
A look at the shareholders of Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600801) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 45% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看華新水泥股份有限公司(SHSE:600801)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。公衆公司持有45%的股份,是公司中最大股份的持有者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大利益(如果股票下跌則損失最大)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 28% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,個人投資者佔該公司股東的28%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Huaxin Cement.
在下面的圖表中,我們將聚焦於華新水泥的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Huaxin Cement?
機構持股對我們了解華新水泥有什麼幫助?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Huaxin Cement already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Huaxin Cement's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Huaxin Cement already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This CAN indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You CAN see Huaxin Cement's historic earnings and revenue below, but KEEP in mind there's always more to the story.
Huaxin Cement is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Holcim AG is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Huaxin Group Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
華新水泥並不被對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,Holcim AG是最大股東,擁有40%的流通股份。華新集團有限公司是第二大股東,持有16%的普通股,而海螺水泥有限公司則持有大約4.5%的公司股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Huaxin Cement
華新水泥的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥69m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,華新水泥有限公司的內部人士持股少於1%。但他們可能通過我們未發現的公司結構間接持有股份。該公司相當大,因此董事會成員可能會在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份,而不一定要持有比例大的股份。在這種情況下,他們持有約6900萬元人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買賣同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Huaxin Cement. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆的持股比例爲28%,這主要是由個人投資者構成,他們在華新水泥中擁有一定的影響力。儘管這種持股比例不足以在政策決策中獲得他們的支持,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Huaxin Cement stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司擁有華新水泥股票的16%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司對一家上市公司的股份有興趣。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 45% of the Huaxin Cement shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到上市公司持有華新水泥已發行股份的45%。這可能是一種戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。它們可能已經分拆。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Huaxin Cement you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的情況非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們發現華新水泥有一個警告信號你應該了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。